Middle ear cholesteatoma: Compared diagnostic performances of two incremental MRI protocols including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging acquired on 3T and 1.5T scanners

被引:18
|
作者
Lincot, J. [1 ]
Veillon, F. [1 ,2 ]
Riehm, S. [1 ]
Babay, N. [1 ]
Matern, J. -F. [1 ,2 ]
Rock, B. [1 ]
Dallaudiere, B. [3 ]
Meyer, N. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Hautepierre, Strasbourg Hautepierre Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol 1, F-67098 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg, Fac Med, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[3] Bichat Claude Bernard Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, F-75018 Paris, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, Lab Biostat & Med Informat, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Cholesteatoma; Temporal bone; Middle ear masses; Non-echo planar; Diffusion-weighted imaging; POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL CHOLESTEATOMA; OVERLAPPING PARALLEL LINES; TURBO SPIN-ECHO; SINGLE-SHOT; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurad.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose: To compare diagnostic performances for cholesteatoma diagnosis of incremental MRI protocols including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) performed on 3T and 1.5T scanners. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine patients with suspected cholesteatoma underwent 3T and 1.5T non-echo planar DWI and additional unenhanced T1-, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1- and high-resolution T2-weighted standard acquisitions. Patients either underwent surgical tympanoplasty (n = 21) or close clinicoradiological follow-up (n = 18). Four radiologists independently and prospectively interpreted two incremental MRI protocols, differing in the magnetic field strength of the diffusion-weighted acquisition and comprising the three standard sequences. At each step, diagnostic performances were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. Results: Forty middle ear lesions including 21 cholesteatomas were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis did not demonstrate significant reader, sequence addition or DWI magnetic field effect on diagnostic performances. Concerning non-echo planar DWI alone, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy ranged between 90.5-100%, 68.4-100%, 76.9-100%, 90.0-100% and 82.5-95.0, respectively. Conclusion: Non-echo planar DWI for cholesteatoma diagnosis can be performed on 1.5T or 3T scanners indifferently. High sensitivity and negative predictive value and relatively lower specificity and positive predictive value are achieved by a single non-echo planar DWI protocol. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] 3-T Breast Diffusion-Weighted MRI by Echo-Planar Imaging With Spectral Spatial Excitation or With Additional Spectral Inversion Recovery: An In Vivo Comparison of Image Quality
    Jacobsen, Megan C.
    Dogan, Basak E.
    Adrada, Beatriz E.
    Plaxco, Jeri Sue
    Wei, Wei
    Son, Jong Bum
    Hazle, John D.
    Ma, Jingfei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (03) : 343 - 348
  • [22] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Human Carotid Artery Using 2D Single-Shot Interleaved Multislice Inner Volume Diffusion-Weighted Echo Planar Imaging (2D ss-IMIV-DWEPI) at 3T: Diffusion Measurement in Atherosclerotic Plaque
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Jeong, Eun-Kee
    Shi, Xian-Feng
    Morrell, Glen
    Treiman, Gerald S.
    Parker, Dennis L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (05) : 1068 - 1077
  • [23] Diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging of the head and neck using 3-T MRI: Investigation into the usefulness of liquid perfluorocarbon pads and choice of optimal fat suppression method
    Maehara, Minoru
    Ikeda, Koshi
    Kurokawa, Hiroaki
    Ohmura, Naoto
    Ikeda, Shigeki
    Hirokawa, Yuzo
    Maehara, Saori
    Utsunomiya, Keita
    Tanigawa, Noboru
    Sawada, Satoshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (05) : 440 - 445
  • [24] Objective Value of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Map from Ultrahigh b-value Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) in 3T MRI could be a Non-invasive Specific Biomarker for Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Kun
    Zhang, Chen
    Chen, Zhengming
    Zhang, Yun
    Dong, Zhe
    Hu, Yingying
    Wang, Meifeng
    Fu, Yonggui
    Ye, Huiyi
    Shen, Yanguang
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20