Middle ear cholesteatoma: Compared diagnostic performances of two incremental MRI protocols including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging acquired on 3T and 1.5T scanners

被引:18
|
作者
Lincot, J. [1 ]
Veillon, F. [1 ,2 ]
Riehm, S. [1 ]
Babay, N. [1 ]
Matern, J. -F. [1 ,2 ]
Rock, B. [1 ]
Dallaudiere, B. [3 ]
Meyer, N. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Hautepierre, Strasbourg Hautepierre Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol 1, F-67098 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg, Fac Med, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[3] Bichat Claude Bernard Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, F-75018 Paris, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, Lab Biostat & Med Informat, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Cholesteatoma; Temporal bone; Middle ear masses; Non-echo planar; Diffusion-weighted imaging; POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL CHOLESTEATOMA; OVERLAPPING PARALLEL LINES; TURBO SPIN-ECHO; SINGLE-SHOT; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurad.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose: To compare diagnostic performances for cholesteatoma diagnosis of incremental MRI protocols including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) performed on 3T and 1.5T scanners. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine patients with suspected cholesteatoma underwent 3T and 1.5T non-echo planar DWI and additional unenhanced T1-, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1- and high-resolution T2-weighted standard acquisitions. Patients either underwent surgical tympanoplasty (n = 21) or close clinicoradiological follow-up (n = 18). Four radiologists independently and prospectively interpreted two incremental MRI protocols, differing in the magnetic field strength of the diffusion-weighted acquisition and comprising the three standard sequences. At each step, diagnostic performances were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. Results: Forty middle ear lesions including 21 cholesteatomas were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis did not demonstrate significant reader, sequence addition or DWI magnetic field effect on diagnostic performances. Concerning non-echo planar DWI alone, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy ranged between 90.5-100%, 68.4-100%, 76.9-100%, 90.0-100% and 82.5-95.0, respectively. Conclusion: Non-echo planar DWI for cholesteatoma diagnosis can be performed on 1.5T or 3T scanners indifferently. High sensitivity and negative predictive value and relatively lower specificity and positive predictive value are achieved by a single non-echo planar DWI protocol. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] The diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid
    Lips, L. M. J.
    Nelemans, P. J.
    Theunissen, F. M. D.
    Roele, E.
    van Tongeren, J.
    Hof, J. R.
    Postma, A. A.
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 47 (06) : 433 - 440
  • [2] Diagnostic capacity of non-echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of primary and recurrent cholesteatoma
    Garrido, Laura
    Cenjor, Carlos
    Montoya, Julia
    Alonso, Ana
    Granell, Jose
    Gutierrez-Fonseca, Raimundo
    ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2015, 66 (04): : 199 - 204
  • [3] Selection of a Surgical Approach for Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Based on the Fusion Images of Non-Echo Planar Diffusion-Weighted MRI and CT
    Cao, Maorong
    Xu, Tong
    Jiang, Wen
    Chen, Chengfang
    Yang, Huiming
    Man, Rongjun
    Yu, Shudong
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 133 (06) : 598 - 604
  • [4] Detection of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging: Multishot Echo-Planar Imaging Compared with Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
    Yamashita, K.
    Yoshiura, T.
    Hiwatashi, A.
    Kamano, H.
    Dashjamts, T.
    Shibata, S.
    Tamae, A.
    Honda, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (10) : 1915 - 1918
  • [5] Non-echo Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Recurrent or Residual Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of Diagnostic Studies
    Amoodi, Hosam
    Mofti, Abdelelah
    Fatani, Nawaf H.
    Alhatem, Hatem
    Zabidi, Ahmed
    Ibrahim, Mohammad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [6] The value of non echo planar, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of residual or recurrent middle-ear cholesteatoma
    Velthuis, S.
    Van Everdingen, K. J.
    Quak, J. J.
    Colnot, D. R.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2014, 128 (07) : 599 - 603
  • [7] Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non-Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging-Value in Detection
    De Foer, Bert
    Vercruysse, Jean-Philippe
    Bernaerts, Anja
    Meersschaert, Joke
    Kenis, Christoph
    Pouillon, Marc
    De Beuckeleer, Luc
    Michiels, Johan
    Bogaerts, Kris
    Deckers, Filip
    Somers, Thomas
    Hermans, Robert
    Offeciers, Erwin
    Casselman, Jan W.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (03) : 866 - 872
  • [8] Comparison between turbo spin-echo and echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvis with 3T MRI
    Yoshizako, Takeshi
    Yoshida, Rika
    Asou, Hiroya
    Nakamura, Megumi
    Kitagaki, Hajime
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2021, 10 (02)
  • [9] Non echo planar, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction sequence) compared with echo planar imaging for the detection of middle-ear cholesteatoma
    De Foer, B.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2011, 125 (08) : 877 - 878
  • [10] Detectability and anatomical correlation of middle ear cholesteatoma using fused thin slice non-echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted image and magnetic resonance cisternography (FTS-nEPID)
    Kanoto, Masafumi
    Sugai, Yukio
    Hosoya, Takaaki
    Toyoguchi, Yuuki
    Konno, Yoshihiro
    Watarai, Fumika
    Ito, Tsukasa
    Watanabe, Tomoo
    Kakehata, Seiji
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (10) : 1253 - 1257