Evidence-based guidelines for use of probiotics in preterm neonates

被引:106
作者
Deshpande, Girish C. [2 ,3 ]
Rao, Shripada C. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Keil, Anthony D. [1 ]
Patole, Sanjay K. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] KEM Hosp Women, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Nepean Hosp Sydney, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2011年 / 9卷
关键词
LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; PREVENT NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; STANDARDIZED FEEDING REGIMENS; DOUBLE-BLIND; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS; ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION; ENTERIC COLONIZATION; INFANTS; PREBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1186/1741-7015-9-92
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Current evidence indicates that probiotic supplementation significantly reduces all cause mortality and definite necrotising enterocolitis without significant adverse effects in preterm neonates. As the debate about the pros and cons of routine probiotic supplementation continues, many institutions are satisfied with the current evidence and wish to use probiotics routinely. Because of the lack of detail on many practical aspects of probiotic supplementation, clinician-friendly guidelines are urgently needed to optimise use of probiotics in preterm neonates. Aim: To develop evidence-based guidelines for probiotic supplementation in preterm neonates. Methods: To develop core guidelines on use of probiotics, including strain selection, dose and duration of supplementation, we primarily used the data from our recent updated systematic review of randomised controlled trials. For equally important issues including strain identification, monitoring for adverse effects, product format, storage and transport, and regulatory hurdles, a comprehensive literature search, covering the period 1966-2010 without restriction on the study design, was conducted, using the databases PubMed and EMBASE, and the proceedings of scientific conferences; these data were used in our updated systematic review. Results: In this review, we present guidelines, including level of evidence, for the practical aspects (for example, strain selection, dose, duration, clinical and laboratory surveillance) of probiotic supplementation, and for dealing with non-clinical but important issues (for example, regulatory requirements, product format). Evidence was inadequate in some areas, and these should be a target for further research. Conclusion: We hope that these evidence-based guidelines will help to optimise the use of probiotics in preterm neonates. Continued research is essential to provide answers to the current gaps in knowledge about probiotics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 155 条
  • [1] The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers
    Adams, Clifford A.
    [J]. NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2010, 23 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [2] Effects of oral Lactobacillus GG on enteric microflora in low-birth-weight neonates
    Agarwal, R
    Sharma, N
    Chaudhry, R
    Deorari, A
    Paul, VK
    Gewolb, IH
    Panigrahi, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2003, 36 (03) : 397 - 402
  • [3] Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants
    AlFaleh, K.
    Bassler, D.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01):
  • [4] Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea
    Allen, Stephen J.
    Martinez, Elizabeth G.
    Gregorio, Germana V.
    Dans, Leonila F.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (11):
  • [5] Current marketplace for probiotics: A Japanese perspective
    Amagase, Harunobu
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 : S73 - S75
  • [6] [Anonymous], IMPACT ENV FACTORS V
  • [7] [Anonymous], DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2008, CLIN INFECT DIS S2
  • [9] [Anonymous], J PEDIAT CHILD HLTH
  • [10] [Anonymous], PIPS TRIAL PROBIOTIC