Swarm intelligence, politics and truth

被引:0
作者
Moya, Eugenio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Filosofia, Murcia, Spain
来源
IDP-INTERNET LAW AND POLITICS | 2019年 / 28期
关键词
democracy; epistocracy; Internet; wisdom of the crowds; NETWORK;
D O I
10.7238/idp.v0i28.3178
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper criticizes scientific deferentialism. This deferentialism is based on an erroneous understanding of science, but it has substantiated the current criticism of democracy as a process of collective decision-making. Plato, one of the earliest to see democracy as a problem, thought that the ignorance and the irrationality of the many justified the government of the wise. Brennan, in Against Democracy (2016), defended the same. The author offers, on the other hand, an innovative alternative based on a fallibilistic conception of knowledge and democracy, according to which democratic authority and legitimacy do not depend on the tendency of democracy to made correct solutions, but on the tendency of intelligent crowds, in the Information Age, to avoid wrong decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 84
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D., 2012, Por que fracasan los paises? Los origenes del poder, la prosperidad y la riqueza
[2]  
[Anonymous], DEMOCRATIC AUTHORITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NETWORKS OUTRAGE HOP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DEMOCRACIA RELATIVIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, REVOLUCION RIQUEZA
[6]  
[Anonymous], AGAINST DEMOCRACY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, HABERMAS PUBLIC SPHE
[8]  
[Anonymous], AA, VXVI, P419
[9]  
BENI G., 2005, SWARM ROBOTICS, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30552-1_1
[10]  
Blum Christian, 2008, P43, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74089-6_2