Multi-Label Multi-Task Deep Learning for Behavioral Coding

被引:0
作者
Gibson, James [1 ]
Atkins, David C. [2 ]
Creed, Torrey A. [3 ]
Imel, Zac [4 ]
Georgiou, Panayiotis [1 ]
Narayanan, Shrikanth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Educ Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
Behavioral coding; behavioral signal processing; multi-label learning; multi-task learning; LANGUAGE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; DISORDERS; THERAPY; EMPATHY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1109/TAFFC.2019.2952113
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We propose a methodology for estimating human behaviors in psychotherapy sessions using multi-label and multi-task learning paradigms. We discuss the problem of behavioral coding in which data of human interactions are annotated with labels to describe relevant human behaviors of interest. We describe two related, yet distinct, corpora consisting of therapist-client interactions in psychotherapy sessions. We experimentally compare the proposed learning approaches for estimating behaviors of interest in these datasets. Specifically, we compare single and multiple label learning approaches, single and multiple task learning approaches, and evaluate the performance of these approaches when incorporating turn context. We demonstrate that the best multi-label, multi-task learning model with turn context achieves 18.9 and 19.5 percent absolute improvements with respect to a logistic regression classifier (for each behavioral coding task respectively) and 6.4 and 6.1 percent absolute improvements with respect to the best single-label, single-task deep neural network models. Lastly, we discuss the insights these modeling paradigms provide into these complex interactions including key commonalities and differences of behaviors within and between the two prevalent psychotherapy approaches-Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-considered.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 518
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P NIPS WORKSH DEEP L
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180206664
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LIT SURVEY ALGORITHM
[4]   Scaling up the evaluation of psychotherapy: evaluating motivational interviewing fidelity via statistical text classification [J].
Atkins, David C. ;
Steyvers, Mark ;
Imel, Zac E. ;
Smyth, Padhraic .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
[5]   Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: A pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counselors [J].
Baer, John S. ;
Wells, Elizabeth A. ;
Rosengren, David B. ;
Hartzler, Bryan ;
Beadnell, Blair ;
Dunn, Chris .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2009, 37 (02) :191-202
[6]  
Bastien F, 2012, DEEP LEARNING UNSUPE, V1211, P5590
[7]   Toward automating a human behavioral coding system for married couples' interactions using speech acoustic features [J].
Black, Matthew P. ;
Katsamanis, Athanasios ;
Baucom, Brian R. ;
Lee, Chi-Chun ;
Lammert, Adam C. ;
Christensen, Andrew ;
Georgiou, Panayiotis G. ;
Narayanan, Shrikanth S. .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2013, 55 (01) :1-21
[8]  
Bo Xiao, 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), P4593, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854472
[9]   Use of machine learning to improve autism screening and diagnostic instruments: effectiveness, efficiency, and multi-instrument fusion [J].
Bone, Daniel ;
Bishop, Somer L. ;
Black, Matthew P. ;
Goodwin, Matthew S. ;
Lord, Catherine ;
Narayanan, Shrikanth S. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 57 (08) :927-937
[10]  
Can DG, 2015, 16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2015), VOLS 1-5, P339