Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET

被引:35
|
作者
Goudarzi, Behnaz [2 ]
Fukushima, Kenji [2 ]
Bravo, Paco [2 ]
Merrill, Jennifer [2 ]
Bengel, Frank M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Nucl Med, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Nucl Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
PET; Myocardial flow reserve; Pharmacological vasodilation; Regadenoson; Coronary artery disease; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; SELECTIVE A(2A) AGONIST; RECEPTOR AGONIST; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADENOSINE; SAFETY; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-011-1853-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Regadenoson is a novel selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonist, which is administered as an intravenous bolus at a fixed dose. It is currently not clear if the absolute flow increase in response to this fixed dose is a function of distribution volume in individual patients or if it is generally comparable to the previous standard agents dipyridamole or adenosine, which are dosed based on weight. We used quantitative analysis of clinical Rb-82 PET/CT studies to obtain further insights. A total of 104 subjects with normal clinical rest/stress Rb-82 perfusion PET/CT were included in a retrospective analysis. To rule out confounding factors, none had evidence of prior cardiac disease, ischaemia or infarction, cardiomyopathy, diabetes with insulin use, calcium score > 400, renal disease or other significant systemic disease. A group of 52 patients stressed with regadenoson were compared with a group of 52 patients stressed with dipyridamole before regadenoson became available. The groups were matched for clinical characteristics, risk factors and baseline haemodynamics. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were quantified using a previously validated retention model, after resampling of dynamic studies from list-mode Rb-82 datasets. At rest, heart rate, blood pressure and MBF were comparable between the groups. Regadenoson resulted in a significantly higher heart rate (34 +/- 14 vs. 23 +/- 10 beats per minute increase from baseline; p < 0.01) and rate-pressure product. Patients in the regadenoson group reported less severe symptoms and required less aminophylline. Stress MBF and MFR were not different between the groups (2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.6 ml/min/g, p = 0.39, and 2.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.7, p = 0.31, respectively). In the regadenoson group, there was no correlation between stress flow or MFR and body weight or BMI. Despite its administration at a fixed dose, regadenoson results in an absolute increase in MBF which is comparable to that following dipyridamole administration and is independent of patient distribution volume. This further supports its usefulness as a clinical stress agent.
引用
收藏
页码:1908 / 1916
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET
    Behnaz Goudarzi
    Kenji Fukushima
    Paco Bravo
    Jennifer Merrill
    Frank M. Bengel
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 1908 - 1916
  • [2] Is the myocardial flow response to regadenoson comparable to dipyridamole? A quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical Rb-82 PET-CT
    Goudarzi, Behnaz
    Fukushima, Kenji
    Merrill, Jennifer
    Bengel, Frank
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51
  • [3] Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial CT perfusion compared with 82Rb PET
    Moller, Mathias B.
    Hasbak, Philip
    Linde, Jesper J.
    Sigvardsen, Per E.
    Kober, Lars, V
    Kofoed, Klaus F.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 17 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [4] Quantitative 82Rb PET/CT:: Development and validation of myocardial perfusion database
    Santana, Cesar A.
    Folks, Russell D.
    Garcia, Ernest V.
    Verdes, Liudmila
    Sanyal, Rupan
    Hainer, Jon
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    Esteves, Fabio P.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (07) : 1122 - 1128
  • [5] Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging
    Lortie, Mireille
    Beanlands, Rob S. B.
    Yoshinaga, Keiichiro
    Klein, Ran
    DaSilva, Jean N.
    dekemp, Robert A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (11) : 1765 - 1774
  • [6] Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging
    Mireille Lortie
    Rob S. B. Beanlands
    Keiichiro Yoshinaga
    Ran Klein
    Jean N. DaSilva
    Robert A. deKemp
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007, 34 : 1765 - 1774
  • [7] Automated Motion Correction for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements and Diagnostic Performance of 82Rb PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Kuronuma, Keiichiro
    Wei, Chih-Chun
    Singh, Ananya
    Lemley, Mark
    Hayes, Sean W.
    Otaki, Yuka
    Hyun, Mark C.
    Van Kriekinge, Serge D.
    Kavanagh, Paul
    Huang, Cathleen
    Han, Donghee
    Dey, Damini
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Slomka, Piotr J.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [8] Quantitative 82Rb dynamic pet perfusion analysis with kinetic modeling for myocardial viability: Can we get away with just 82Rb perfusion kinetics?
    Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
    Parthiban Arumugam
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 387 - 390
  • [9] Reproducibility and Accuracy of Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Assessment with 82Rb PET: Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET
    El Fakhri, Georges
    Kardan, Arash
    Sitek, Arkadiusz
    Dorbala, Sharmila
    Abi-Hatem, Nathalie
    Lahoud, Youmna
    Fischman, Alan
    Coughlan, Martha
    Yasuda, Tsunehiro
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (07) : 1062 - 1071
  • [10] Quantitative 82Rb dynamic pet perfusion analysis with kinetic modeling for myocardial viability: Can we get away with just 82Rb perfusion kinetics?
    Ananthasubramaniam, Karthik
    Arumugam, Parthiban
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 387 - 390