Caffeine intake inverts the effect of adenosine on myocardial perfusion during stress as measured by T1 mapping

被引:30
作者
Kuijpers, Dirkjan [1 ,2 ]
Prakken, Niek H. [1 ]
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn [1 ]
van Dijkman, Paul R. M. [2 ]
van der Harst, Pim [3 ]
Oudkerk, Matthijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Med Imaging, Hanzepl 1 EB 45, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] MCH Bronovo, Dept Cardiovasc Imaging, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Cardiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
T1-mapping; Cardiovascular MRI; Caffeine; Biomarkers; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; BLOOD-FLOW; CAPILLARIES; ISCHEMIA; EXERCISE; RESERVE; DISEASE; REST;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-016-0949-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Caffeine intake before adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging may cause false negative findings. We hypothesized that the antagonistic effect of caffeine can be measured by T1 relaxation times in rest and adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), as T1 mapping techniques are sensitive to changes in myocardial blood volume. We prospectively analyzed 105 consecutive patients with adenosine stress perfusion CMR on a 1.5-T MRI system. Rest and stress T1 mapping was performed using Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery. T1 reactivity was defined as difference in T1(rest) and T1(stress) (a dagger T1). Fifteen patients drank coffee within 4 h of CMR (< 4H caffeine group), and 10 patients had coffee the day before (> 8H caffeine group). Comparison was made to patients without self-reported coffee intake: 50 with normal CMR (control group), 18 with myocardial ischemia, and 12 with myocardial infarction. The national review board approved the study; all patients gave written informed consent. The < 4H caffeine group showed inverted a dagger T1 of -7.8 % (T1(rest) 975 +/- 42 ms, T1(stress) 898 +/- 51 ms, p < 0.0005). The > 8H caffeine group showed reduced T1 reactivity (1.8 %; T1(rest) 979 ms, T1(stress) 997 ms) compared to the controls (4.3 %; T1(rest) 977 +/- 40 ms, T1(stress) 1018 +/- 40 ms), p < 0.0005. Ischemic and infarcted myocardium showed minimal T1 reactivity (0.2 and 0.3 %, respectively). Caffeine intake inverts the adenosine effect during stress perfusion CMR as measured by T1 mapping. T1 reactivity can assess the adequacy of adenosine-induced stress in perfusion CMR.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1553
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J CARDIOVASC MAGN R
[2]  
[Anonymous], REV ESPANOLA CARDIOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J CARDIOVASC MAGN R
[4]   ADENOSINE INCREASES SYMPATHETIC-NERVE TRAFFIC IN HUMANS [J].
BIAGGIONI, I ;
KILLIAN, TJ ;
MOSQUEDAGARCIA, R ;
ROBERTSON, RM ;
ROBERTSON, D .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (05) :1668-1675
[5]  
BOTTCHER M, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P2016
[6]   Human non-contrast T1 values and correlation with histology in diffuse fibrosis [J].
Bull, Sacha ;
White, Steven K. ;
Piechnik, Stefan K. ;
Flett, Andrew S. ;
Ferreira, Vanessa M. ;
Loudon, Margaret ;
Francis, Jane M. ;
Karamitsos, Theodoros D. ;
Prendergast, Bernard D. ;
Robson, Matthew D. ;
Neubauer, Stefan ;
Moon, James C. ;
Myerson, Saul G. .
HEART, 2013, 99 (13) :932-937
[7]   Coffee acutely increases sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure independently of caffeine content -: Role of habitual versus nonhabitual drinking [J].
Corti, R ;
Binggeli, C ;
Sudano, I ;
Spieker, L ;
Hänseler, E ;
Ruschitzka, F ;
Chaplin, WF ;
Lüscher, TF ;
Noll, G .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (23) :2935-2940
[8]   Effects of cardiac sympathetic innervation on coronary blood flow [J].
DiCarli, MF ;
Tobes, MC ;
Mangner, T ;
Levine, AB ;
Muzik, O ;
Chakroborty, P ;
Levine, TB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (17) :1208-1215
[9]   Comparison of the potency of adenosine as an agonist at human adenosine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells [J].
Fredholm, BB ;
Irenius, E ;
Kull, B ;
Schulte, G .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 61 (04) :443-448
[10]   The effect of caffeine on adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging: Time to reassess? [J].
Hage, Fadi G. ;
Iskandrian, Ami E. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) :415-419