Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making

被引:228
作者
Ubel, PA
Loewenstein, G
Schwarz, N
Smith, D
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Program Improving Hlth Care Decis, Div Gen Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Program Improving Hlth Care Decis, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[10] VAMC, Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
quality of life; disability paradox; decision making; scale recalibration; adaptation;
D O I
10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S57
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Good decision making often requires accurate predictions about how potential outcomes will make one feel. However, people often mispredict the emotional impact of unfamiliar circumstances. For example, they often overestimate the emotional impact that chronic illnesses and disability will have on their lives. In the present article, the authors look at possible sources of error in both the happiness reports of patients with chronic illness or disability and the happiness predictions of healthy people asked to imagine the same illnesses and disabilities. On balance, the available evidence suggests that, whereas patients misreport their well-being, healthy people also mispredict the emotional impact that chronic illness and disability will have on their lives.
引用
收藏
页码:S57 / S62
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds [J].
Albrecht, GL ;
Devlieger, PJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (08) :977-988
[2]   THE TIME TRADE-OFF TECHNIQUE - HOW DO THE VALUATIONS OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS COMPARE TO THOSE OF OTHER GROUPS [J].
ASHBY, J ;
OHANLON, M ;
BUXTON, MJ .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (04) :257-265
[3]   Effect of assessment method on the discrepancy between judgments of health disorders people have and do not have: A Web study [J].
Baron, J ;
Asch, DA ;
Fagerlin, A ;
Jepson, C ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Riis, J ;
Stineman, MG ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (05) :422-434
[4]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[5]   I know just how you feel: The validity of healthy women's perceptions of breast-cancer patients receiving treatment [J].
Buick, DL ;
Petrie, KJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (01) :110-123
[6]  
DAMSCHRODER LJ, IN PRESS SOCIAL SCI
[7]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[8]   WHEN MORE PAIN IS PREFERRED TO LESS - ADDING A BETTER END [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
FREDRICKSON, BL ;
SCHREIBER, CA ;
REDELMEIER, DA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (06) :401-405
[9]  
Kahneman D., 1999, WELL BEING FDN HEDON
[10]  
LACEY HM, 2005, UNPUB UNBELIEVABLY H