Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors

被引:45
作者
Savaridas, S. L. [1 ]
Taylor, D. B. [1 ,2 ]
Gunawardana, D. [1 ]
Phillips, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Perth Hosp, Radiol Dept, GPO Box X2213, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Med Res Fdn RPH Bldg, Harry Perkins Inst Med Res, Wellington St, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
关键词
X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR-TISSUE; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; DENSITY CATEGORIES; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; 5TH EDITION; DATA SYSTEM; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To compare background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced (CE) spectral mammography (CESM) with CE magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluate how these relate to hormonal status, mammographic breast density (MBD) and MRI fibroglandular tissue volume (FGTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 2012 to October 2015, participants in a cancer staging study underwent full-field digital mammography (FFDM), CEMRI, and CESM. Two readers independently rated FGTV, MBD, and BPE using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) criteria. Inter-reader reliability was estimated using weighted kappa (k) and correlations between BPE, MBD, and FGTV calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Associations with hormonal status were evaluated using multilevel ordinal regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 96 eligible participants, 66 women (35-77 years) underwent CESM and CEMRI. Reasons for exclusion were declined or withdrawn consent (n=18), inadequate renal function (n=2), claustrophobia (n=2), previous reaction to contrast medium (n=2), mild reaction to contrast medium following CESM (n=2), lack of vascular access (n=1), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=1), CESM equipment failure (n=1), and unclear in one case. Inter-reader agreement was substantial (k=0.67) for CESM BPE, slight (k=0.19) for CEMRI BPE, moderate (k=0.57) for MRI FGTV and fair (k=0.35) for MBD. CESM BPE showed significant correlation with MBD (rho-0.36, p<0.0001), FGTV (rho-0.52, p<0.0001), and MRI BPE (rho-0.49, p<0.0001). BPE was significantly reduced in the post-menopausal group for CEMRI and CESM (p<0.05). CESM BPE did not significantly fluctuate during the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSION: CESM BPE is correlated with MBD, FGTV, and CEMRI BPE, has better inter-reader reliability than CEMRI, and is not influenced by the menstrual cycle. Grading the degree of BPE on CESM could be a useful addition to breast cancer risk assessment tools. (c) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1085.e1 / 1085.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM J ROENTGENOL, DOI DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.1944
[2]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[3]   Reasons Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer Refuse Breast MR Imaging Screening: ACRIN 6666 [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Lehrer, Daniel E. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Gabrielli, Glenna J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (01) :79-87
[4]   Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study [J].
Boyd, Norman ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Chavez, Sofia ;
Gunasekara, Anoma ;
Salleh, Ayesha ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Friedenreich, Christine ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Bronskill, Michael .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2009, 10 (06) :569-580
[5]   Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Chen, Shin-Chih .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :1082-1089
[6]   Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Houssami, N ;
Apruzzese, A ;
Bassetti, E ;
Brancato, B ;
Carozzi, F ;
Catarzi, S ;
Lamberini, MP ;
Marcelli, G ;
Pellizzoni, R ;
Pesce, B ;
Risso, G ;
Russo, F ;
Scorsolini, A .
BREAST, 2005, 14 (04) :269-275
[7]  
Cubuk R, 2010, RADIOL MED, V115, P434, DOI 10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4
[8]  
D'Orsi C.J., 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas
[9]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) [J].
Daniaux, Martin ;
De Zordo, Tobias ;
Santner, Wolfram ;
Amort, Birgit ;
Koppelstaetter, Florian ;
Jaschke, Werner ;
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Oberaigner, Willi ;
Hubalek, Michael ;
Marth, Christian .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (04) :739-747
[10]   Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: Perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) :236-241