Kinome Analysis of Cattle Peripheral Lymph Nodes to Elucidate Differential Response to Salmonella spp.

被引:3
|
作者
Arsenault, Ryan J. [1 ]
Brown, Tyson R. [2 ]
Edrington, Thomas S. [2 ]
Nisbet, David J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Anim & Food Sci, 044 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Food & Feed Safety Res Unit, 2881 F&B Rd, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
关键词
Salmonella; dairy; beef; innate immunity; kinome; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; PREVALENCE; CARRIAGE; RECEPTOR; VACCINE; O157-H7; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms10010120
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Salmonella spp., contained within the peripheral lymph nodes (PLNs) of cattle, represents a significant source of contamination of ground beef. Herein is the first report where species-specific kinome peptide arrays designed for bovine biology were used to further the understanding of Salmonella spp. within these PLNs. For the purpose of this research, multiple comparisons of sub-iliac lymph nodes were made to include nodes from feedlot cattle that were infected with Salmonella spp. to those that were non-infected; seasonal differences in feedlot cattle harvested in either August or January; cull dairy cows compared to feedlot cattle; and PLNs from cattle experimentally inoculated with Salmonella spp. versus naturally infected animals. The first comparison of Salmonella-positive and -negative PLNs found that considering the kinotypes for these animals, the major distinguishing difference was not the presence or absence of Salmonella spp. in the PLNs but the concentration. Further, the majority of pathways activated were directly related to immune responses including innate immunity, thus Salmonella spp. within the PLNs activates the immune system in that node. Results from the comparison of feedlot cattle and cull dairy cows suggests that a Salmonella spp.-negative animal, regardless of type, has a more consistent kinome profile than that of a Salmonella spp.-positive animal and that the differences between feedlot and cull dairy cattle are only pronounced when the PLNs are Salmonella spp. positive. PLNs collected in the winter showed a much more consistent kinome profile, regardless of Salmonella status, suggesting that in the winter these cattle are similar, and this is not affected by the presence of Salmonella spp., whereas significant variability among kinotypes was observed for PLNs collected in the summer. The most distinct clustering of kinotypes observed in this study was related to how the animal was infected with Salmonella spp. There were significant differences in the phosphorylation state of the immune response peptides between experimentally and naturally infected animals, suggesting that the immune system is activated in a significantly different manner when comparing these routes of infection. Increasing our understanding of Salmonella spp. within cattle, and specifically within the PLNs, will ultimately help design effective pre-harvest intervention strategies as well as appropriate experimentation to validate those technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salmonella in Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Healthy Cattle at Slaughter
    Webb, Hattie E.
    Brichta-Harhay, Dayna M.
    Brashears, Mindy M.
    Nightingale, Kendra K.
    Arthur, Terrance M.
    Bosilevac, Joseph M.
    Kalchayanand, Norasak
    Schmidt, John W.
    Wang, Rong
    Granier, Sophie A.
    Brown, Tyson R.
    Edrington, Thomas S.
    Shackelford, Steven D.
    Wheeler, Tommy L.
    Loneragan, Guy H.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [2] Salmonella spp. in lymph nodes of fed and cull cattle: Relative assessment of risk to ground beef
    Li, Min
    Malladi, Sasidhar
    Hurd, H. Scott
    Goldsmith, Timothy J.
    Brichta-Harhay, Dayna M.
    Loneragan, Guy H.
    FOOD CONTROL, 2015, 50 : 423 - 434
  • [3] Lymph nodes and ground beef as public health importance reservoirs of Salmonella spp.
    Palos Gutierrez, Tania
    Rubio Lozano, Maria Salud
    Delgado Suarez, Enrique Jesus
    Rosi Guzman, Naisy
    Soberanis Ramos, Orbelin
    Hernandez Perez, Cindy Fabiola
    Mendez Medina, Ruben Danilo
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2020, 11 (03) : 795 - 810
  • [4] Salmonella Persistence within the Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Cattle following Experimental Inoculation
    Edrington, T. S.
    Loneragan, G. H.
    Genovese, K. J.
    Hanson, D. L.
    Nisbet, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2016, 79 (06) : 1032 - 1035
  • [5] Neutral barcoding of genomes reveals the dynamics of Salmonella colonization in cattle and their peripheral lymph nodes
    Porwollik, Steffen
    Genovese, Ken
    Chu, Weiping
    Loneragan, Guy H.
    Edrington, Tom
    McClelland, Michael
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 220 : 97 - 106
  • [6] Salmonella Carriage in Peripheral Lymph Nodes and Feces of Cattle at Slaughter Is Affected by Cattle Type, Region, and Season
    Wottlin, Lauren R.
    Edrington, Tom S.
    Anderson, Robin C.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 3
  • [7] Longitudinal Evaluation of Salmonella in Environmental Components and Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Fed Cattle From Weaning to Finish in Three Distinct Feeding Locations
    Arnold, Ashley N.
    Gehring, Kerri B.
    Sawyer, Jason E.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2023, 86 (04)
  • [8] Evaluation of a Preharvest Bacteriophage Therapy for Control of Salmonella within Bovine Peripheral Lymph Nodes
    Wottlin, L. R.
    Edrington, T. S.
    Brown, T. R.
    Zook, C. A.
    Sulakvelidze, A.
    Droleskey, R.
    Genovese, K. J.
    Nisbet, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2022, 85 (02) : 254 - 260
  • [9] A preliminary study of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium spp. in Irish cattle
    Russell, L.
    Galindo, C. P.
    Whyte, P.
    Bolton, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2021, 60 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [10] Oral Salmonella Challenge and Subsequent Uptake by the Peripheral Lymph Nodes in Calves
    Brown, T. R.
    Edrington, T. S.
    Genovese, K. J.
    Loneragan, G. H.
    Hanson, D. L.
    Nisbet, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2015, 78 (03) : 573 - 578