Analysis of multiple-view Bayesian classification for SAR ATR

被引:21
作者
Brown, MZ [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
来源
ALGORITHM FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY X | 2003年 / 5095卷
关键词
synthetic aperture radar; multiple view; performance analysis;
D O I
10.1117/12.487171
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Classification of targets in high-resolution synthetic aperture radar imagery is a challenging problem in practice, due to extended operating conditions such as obscuration, articulation, varied configurations and a host of camouflage, concealment and deception tactics. Due to radar cross-section variability, the ability to discriminate between targets also varies greatly with target aspect. Potential space-borne and air-borne sensor systems may eventually be exploited to provide products to the warfighter at tactically relevant timelines. With such potential systems in place, multiple views of a given target area may be available to support targeting. In this paper, we examine the aspect dependence of SAR target classification and develop a Bayesian classification approach that exploits multiple incoherent views of a target. We further examine several practical issues in the design of such a classifier and consider sensitivities and their implications for sensor planning. Experimental results indicating the benefits of aspect diversity for improving performance under extended operating conditions are shown using publicly released I-foot SAR data from DARPA's MSTAR program.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Benefits of aspect diversity for SAR ATR: Fundamental and experimental results [J].
Brendel, GF ;
Horowitz, LL .
ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY VII, 2000, 4053 :567-578
[2]  
DEVORE MD, 2001, THESIS WASHINGTON U
[3]   Fundamental SAR ATR performance predictions for design tradeoffs [J].
Horowitz, LL ;
Brendel, GF .
ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY IV, 1997, 3070 :267-284
[4]   Fundamental SAR ATR performance predictions for design tradeoffs: 1-D HRR versus 2-D SAR versus 3-D SAR [J].
Horowitz, LL ;
Brendel, GF .
ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY VI, 1999, 3721 :763-784
[5]   Model-based ATR using synthetic aperture radar [J].
Hummel, R .
RECORD OF THE IEEE 2000 INTERNATIONAL RADAR CONFERENCE, 2000, :856-861
[6]   Statistical pattern recognition: A review [J].
Jain, AK ;
Duin, RPW ;
Mao, JC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 22 (01) :4-37
[7]  
Kanade T., 1992, P DARPA IM UND WORKS, P409
[8]  
MATHIEUMARNI S, 1997, P IEEE INT C IM PROC, V1, P885
[9]  
Meth R, 1998, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P2745, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.1998.678091
[10]   An evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions [J].
Mossing, JC ;
Ross, TD .
ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY V, 1998, 3370 :554-565