Comparison of Coracoid Graft Position and Fixation in the Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: A Cadaveric Study

被引:7
|
作者
Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro [2 ]
Garcia-Esteo, Francisco [3 ,4 ]
Merida-Velasco, Jose Ramon [1 ]
Barrio-Asensio, Carmen [1 ]
Lopez-Fernandez, Pedro [5 ,6 ]
Aramberri-Gutierrez, Mikel [1 ,7 ]
Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Anat & Embryol, Avda Complutense S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Hosp Fraternidad Muprespa, Madrid, Spain
[3] Jimenez Diaz Fdn, Serv Traumatol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Francisco de Vitoria Univ, Fac Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, Madrid, Spain
[5] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Basic Hlth Sci, Div Human Anat & Embryol, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Hosp Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Surg, Madrid, Spain
[7] Alai Sports Med Clin, Madrid, Spain
关键词
shoulder instability; open Latarjet technique; arthroscopic Latarjet technique; graft positioning; graft fixation; cadaveric study; 2-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RECURRENT ANTERIOR DISLOCATION; SHOULDER DISLOCATION; BONE-BLOCK; BRISTOW; INSTABILITY; REPAIRS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520930419
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since the description of the arthroscopic Latarjet technique, discussion about the superiority of the open or arthroscopic procedure has arisen. The appropriate placement of the coracoid graft (CG) on the anterior glenoid neck is reported to be the most important step of the Latarjet procedure. Purpose: To verify if there are differences in the parameters that may affect the final position and fixation of CG obtained from the open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human paired cadaveric shoulder specimens were randomly distributed in 2 surgery groups (open group [OG] and arthroscopic group [AG]) with 10 specimens in each. Two surgeons, each with experience performing open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques, executed these procedures: one surgeon performed all open techniques, and the other performed all arthroscopic techniques, respectively. After surgery, a computerized tomography scan was performed. The surgical time, the position of each CG, a series of variables that might affect the CG fixation, and the level of the subscapularis muscle split were evaluated. Results: The mean surgical time was significantly longer in the AG (mean, 26 minutes for OG and 57 minutes for AG). Three intraoperative complications (30%) were identified in the AG, consisting of graft fractures. The CG was determined to be in an optimal cranial-caudal position in 90% of specimens of the OG and 44% of the AG (Fisher,P= .057). In both groups, the CG was placed in an optimal medial-lateral position in all specimens. In the OG, the degree of parallelism between the major axes of the glenoid surface and CG was significantly greater than in the AG (mean, 3.8o for OG and 15.1o for AG). No significant differences were observed in superior and inferior screw orientation between the groups. In the longitudinal and transverse directions, significant differences were found in the centering of the superior screw, being closer to the ideal point in the OG than in the AG. The location where the longitudinal subscapularis muscle split was performed was significantly higher in the AG. Conclusion: The open Latarjet technique required less surgical time; presented a lower number of intraoperative complications; and allowed more adequate placement of the CG, better centering of the screws, and a subscapularis muscle split closer to the ideal position.
引用
收藏
页码:2105 / 2114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for First-Time Dislocators in Athletes
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Davey, Martin S.
    Montgomery, Connor
    O'Doherty, Ross
    Gaafar, Mohamed
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Mullett, Hannan
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [42] Open Shoulder Repair of Osseous Glenoid Defects Biomechanical Effectiveness of the Latarjet Procedure Versus a Contoured Structural Bone Graft
    Wellmann, Mathias
    Petersen, Wolf
    Zantop, Thore
    Herbort, Mirco
    Kobbe, Philipp
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Hurschler, Christof
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [43] Short-Term Bone Fusion With Arthroscopic Double-Button Latarjet Versus Open-Screw Latarjet
    Bonnevialle, Nicolas
    Girard, Mathieu
    Dalmas, Yoann
    Martinel, Vincent
    Faruch, Marie
    Mansat, Pierre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (06) : 1596 - 1603
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability
    Pugliese, Mattia
    Loppini, Mattia
    Vanni, Elena
    Longo, Giuseppe Umile
    Castagna, Alessandro
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (07) : 1771 - 1777
  • [45] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—computed tomography evaluation at a short term follow-up. Part II
    Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz
    Maciej Kicinski
    Konrad Małachowski
    Janusz Wieczorek
    Sławomir Chaberek
    Stanisław Pomianowski
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 1119 - 1128
  • [46] Comparison of Modified Latarjet Procedure With Bone Graft Versus Standard Latarjet Procedure: Evaluating Outcomes and Stability
    Nair, Vinod
    Muneer, Mohammed Talha
    Chowdhary, Sahil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [47] The cost-effectiveness of the arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability
    Min, Kyong
    Fedorka, Catherine
    Solberg, Muriel J.
    Shaha, Steven H.
    Higgins, Laurence D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : S2 - S9
  • [48] Coracoid bone block versus arthroscopic Bankart repair: A comparative paired study with 5-year follow-up
    Bessiere, C.
    Trojani, C.
    Pelegri, C.
    Carles, M.
    Boileau, P.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [49] Bone Fragment Resorption and Clinical Outcomes of Traumatic Bony Bankart Lesion Treated With Arthroscopic Repair Versus Open Latarjet
    Di Giacomo, Giovanni
    Pugliese, Mattia
    Peebles, Annalise M.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (05) : 1336 - 1343
  • [50] Cadaveric Biomechanical Study of Partial Glenoid Arthroplasty Versus the Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Lee, Kyung Jae
    Jang, Young Hoon
    Yang, Sook
    Lee, Thay Q.
    Mcgarry, Michelle
    Kim, Sae Hoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (12) : 3217 - 3225