Comparison of Coracoid Graft Position and Fixation in the Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: A Cadaveric Study

被引:7
|
作者
Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro [2 ]
Garcia-Esteo, Francisco [3 ,4 ]
Merida-Velasco, Jose Ramon [1 ]
Barrio-Asensio, Carmen [1 ]
Lopez-Fernandez, Pedro [5 ,6 ]
Aramberri-Gutierrez, Mikel [1 ,7 ]
Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Anat & Embryol, Avda Complutense S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Hosp Fraternidad Muprespa, Madrid, Spain
[3] Jimenez Diaz Fdn, Serv Traumatol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Francisco de Vitoria Univ, Fac Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, Madrid, Spain
[5] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Basic Hlth Sci, Div Human Anat & Embryol, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Hosp Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Surg, Madrid, Spain
[7] Alai Sports Med Clin, Madrid, Spain
关键词
shoulder instability; open Latarjet technique; arthroscopic Latarjet technique; graft positioning; graft fixation; cadaveric study; 2-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RECURRENT ANTERIOR DISLOCATION; SHOULDER DISLOCATION; BONE-BLOCK; BRISTOW; INSTABILITY; REPAIRS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520930419
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since the description of the arthroscopic Latarjet technique, discussion about the superiority of the open or arthroscopic procedure has arisen. The appropriate placement of the coracoid graft (CG) on the anterior glenoid neck is reported to be the most important step of the Latarjet procedure. Purpose: To verify if there are differences in the parameters that may affect the final position and fixation of CG obtained from the open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human paired cadaveric shoulder specimens were randomly distributed in 2 surgery groups (open group [OG] and arthroscopic group [AG]) with 10 specimens in each. Two surgeons, each with experience performing open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques, executed these procedures: one surgeon performed all open techniques, and the other performed all arthroscopic techniques, respectively. After surgery, a computerized tomography scan was performed. The surgical time, the position of each CG, a series of variables that might affect the CG fixation, and the level of the subscapularis muscle split were evaluated. Results: The mean surgical time was significantly longer in the AG (mean, 26 minutes for OG and 57 minutes for AG). Three intraoperative complications (30%) were identified in the AG, consisting of graft fractures. The CG was determined to be in an optimal cranial-caudal position in 90% of specimens of the OG and 44% of the AG (Fisher,P= .057). In both groups, the CG was placed in an optimal medial-lateral position in all specimens. In the OG, the degree of parallelism between the major axes of the glenoid surface and CG was significantly greater than in the AG (mean, 3.8o for OG and 15.1o for AG). No significant differences were observed in superior and inferior screw orientation between the groups. In the longitudinal and transverse directions, significant differences were found in the centering of the superior screw, being closer to the ideal point in the OG than in the AG. The location where the longitudinal subscapularis muscle split was performed was significantly higher in the AG. Conclusion: The open Latarjet technique required less surgical time; presented a lower number of intraoperative complications; and allowed more adequate placement of the CG, better centering of the screws, and a subscapularis muscle split closer to the ideal position.
引用
收藏
页码:2105 / 2114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-computed tomography evaluation at a short term follow-up. Part II
    Kordasiewicz, Bartlomiej
    Kicinski, Maciej
    Malachowski, Konrad
    Wieczorek, Janusz
    Chaberek, Slawomir
    Pomianowski, Stanislaw
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (05) : 1119 - 1128
  • [22] Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis
    Cunningham, G.
    Benchouk, S.
    Kherad, O.
    Laedermann, A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (02) : 540 - 545
  • [23] Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis
    G. Cunningham
    S. Benchouk
    O. Kherad
    A. Lädermann
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 540 - 545
  • [24] Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies
    Nolan S. Horner
    Paul A. Moroz
    Raman Bhullar
    Anthony Habib
    Nicole Simunovic
    Ivan Wong
    Asheesh Bedi
    Olufemi R. Ayeni
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [25] Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies
    Horner, Nolan S.
    Moroz, Paul A.
    Bhullar, Raman
    Habib, Anthony
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Wong, Ivan
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [26] All Arthroscopic Salvage Technique for Intraoperative Vertical Split Coracoid Graft Fracture in Latarjet ProceduredTechnical Note
    Nair, Ayyappan V.
    Mohan, Pramod Kumar
    Krishna, Pavan
    Jangale, Ajit
    Kareemulla, Syed
    Goud, Naresh
    Thampy, Sreejith
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2024, 13 (01): : e1 - e7
  • [27] A hybrid open-arthroscopic latarjet coracoid bone-block technique using "HyLa" instrumentation
    Lami, Damien
    Fauvet, Nicolas
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    Grillo, Jean-Charles
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2021, 107 (05)
  • [28] Arthroscopic versus open Latarjet in the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study
    Savo, Alfredo
    Lanzetti, Riccardo Maria
    Topa, Domenico
    Campagna, Vincenzo
    Pulcinelli, Ferdinando
    Spoliti, Marco
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01): : 51 - 57
  • [29] Functional outcomes after open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: A prospective comparative study
    Nourissat, G.
    Neyton, L.
    Metais, P.
    Clavert, P.
    Villain, B.
    Haeni, D.
    Walch, G.
    Lafosse, L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (08) : S277 - S279
  • [30] Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients' morphometric considerations
    Boutsiadis, Achilleas
    Bampis, Ioannis
    Swan, John
    Barth, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 7 (01)