Adaptation of the Ryff psychological well-being scale with a sample of survivors of the Colombian armed conflict

被引:0
作者
Miguel Salas-Picon, Wilson [1 ]
Lucia Avendano-Prieto, Bertha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cooperat Colombia, Barrancabermeja, Colombia
[2] Univ Catolica Colombia, Psicol, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Well-being; victims; violence; psychology; victimization (source; Latin American Criminal Policy Thesaurus-ILANUD and Criminological Thesaurus-UNICRI); POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; HAPPINESS; VALIDITY; HEALTH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Measurement with context-standardized tools represents a quality factor for evidence-based assessment. The Ryff Psychological Well-Being scale and its adaptations in the Hispanic population lack evidence of validity for the surviving population of the armed conflict. The present study analyzes the psychometric properties and estimates the cut-off point, sensitivity and specificity of the Ryff Psychological Well-being scale. An instrumental quantitative study was conducted with 297 survivors between 18 and 78 years ((X) over bar =41.83 S=14.76) and 200 participants from the general population between 18 and 69 years ((X) over bar =32.68 S=12.20). A scale of 22 items resulting from psychometric analyses is proposed. The confirmatory factor analysis validates the theoretical proposal of the six dimensions proposed by the authors. The Cronbach alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients were .69 and .70. The set cut-off point was 89.5, with a sensitivity of .92 and specificity of .62. The findings open a new path of exploration in the field of study given that there are no validation investigations that compare groups with particular characteristics in Colombia.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 244
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Andrade Salazar J., 2013, REV ELECTRONICA PSIC, V25, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.21501/16920945.645, DOI 10.21501/16920945.645]
  • [2] Aranguren María, 2015, Cienc. Psicol., V9, P73
  • [3] Ato M, 2013, AN PSICOL-SPAIN, V29, P1038
  • [4] Prieto BLA, 2021, ACTA COLOMB PSICOL, V24, P19, DOI [10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.3, 10.14718/acp.2021.24.1.3]
  • [5] Comparison of scaling methods for activities of daily living in older people
    Ayala, Alba
    Pujol, Rogelio
    Joao Forjaz, Maria
    Abellan, Antonio
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2019, 33 (06) : 511 - 516
  • [6] Basenko O., 2020, PSYCHOL J, V6, P56, DOI [10.31108/1.2020.6.5.5, DOI 10.31108/1.2020.6.5.5]
  • [7] Blum D, 2013, SUMMA PSICOLOGICA US, V10, P49, DOI DOI 10.18774/448X.2013.10.140
  • [8] The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment
    Borenstein, Jason
    Drake, Matthew J.
    Kirkman, Robert
    Swann, Julie L.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2010, 16 (02) : 387 - 407
  • [9] ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT
    BROWNE, MW
    CUDECK, R
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) : 230 - 258
  • [10] From War to Life: Psychological Well-Being in Adult Victims of Child Recruitment
    Camila Garzon-Velandia, Diana
    Rozo, Maria Margarita
    Blanco, Amalio
    [J]. PEACE AND CONFLICT-JOURNAL OF PEACE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) : 293 - 302