Does the Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Increase Corporate Tax Avoidance? Evidence from China

被引:6
作者
Feng, Chen [1 ]
Zhu, Xingshu [1 ]
Gu, Yu [2 ]
Liu, Yuecheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon emissions trading policy; corporate tax avoidance; environmental regulation; cash flow; China; FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; IMPACT; INVESTMENT; FIRMS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; EVASION;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2021.821219
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Based on the natural experiment of carbon emissions trading pilots in China, this paper investigates the effect of environmental regulation on corporate tax avoidance. The results show that: 1) Market-incentivized environmental regulation significantly increase the level of corporate tax avoidance. 2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the effect is more obvious on the non-state-owned firms, firms with severe financing constraints, and firms in highly competitive industries. 3) We find that the reduction of cash flow is the channel for environmental regulation to affect corporate tax avoidance. 4) Further analysis shows that government subsidies can alleviate the enhancement of tax avoidance by environmental regulation. The more government subsidies a company receives, the less tax avoidance it has.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abrell J., 2008, ASSESSING IMPACT EU
  • [2] Why Do Firms Evade Taxes? The Role of Information Sharing and Financial Sector Outreach
    Beck, Thorsten
    Lin, Chen
    Ma, Yue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 69 (02) : 763 - 817
  • [3] Blundell R., 2000, FISC STUD, V21, P427, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1475-5890.2000.TB00031.X, 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x]
  • [4] Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major Shareholder
    Bradshaw, Mark
    Liao, Guanmin
    Ma, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 67 (2-3) : 255 - 277
  • [5] Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: Evidence from real estate development
    Bulan, Laarni
    Mayer, Christopher
    Somerville, C. Tsuriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2009, 65 (03) : 237 - 251
  • [6] COMPETITION AND CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE INDUSTRIAL FIRMS
    Cai, Hongbin
    Liu, Qiao
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2009, 119 (537) : 764 - 795
  • [7] Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Cai, Xiqian
    Lu, Yi
    Wu, Mingqin
    Yu, Linhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 : 73 - 85
  • [8] The effect of a fiscal squeeze on tax enforcement: Evidence from a natural experiment in China
    Chen, Shawn Xiaoguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 147 : 62 - 76
  • [9] Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Fanglin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 168
  • [10] Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence
    Chetty, Raj
    Looney, Adam
    Kroft, Kory
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) : 1145 - 1177