The relationship between obesity, low back pain, and lumbar disc degeneration when genetics and the environment are considered: a systematic review of twin studies

被引:156
作者
Dario, Amabile B. [1 ]
Ferreira, Manuela L. [2 ,3 ]
Refshauge, Kathryn M. [1 ]
Lima, Thais S. [4 ,5 ]
Ordonana, Juan R. [6 ]
Ferreira, Paulo H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Kolling Inst, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Kolling Inst, Inst Bone & Joint Res, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Sci & Technol, Biomech & Motor Control Res Grp, BR-19060900 Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Murcia, Dept Human Anat & Psychobiol, Murcia Twin Registry, Murcia 30100, Spain
[6] IMIB Arrixaca, Dept Human Anat & Psychobiol, Murcia 30100, Spain
关键词
Obesity; Body mass index; Body weight; Low back pain; Lumbar disc degeneration; Genetics; Twins; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS; RADIOLOGICAL CHANGES; SPINE; PROGRESSION; YOUNG; DETERMINANTS; DISABILITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The relationships between obesity and low back pain (LBP) and lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) remain unclear. It is possible that familial factors, including genetics and early environment, affect these relationships. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between obesity-related measures (eg, weight, body mass index [BMI]) and LBP and LDD using twin studies, where the effect of genetics and early environment can be controlled. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched from the earliest records to August 2014. All cross-sectional and longitudinal observational twin studies identified by the search strategy were considered for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility, conducted the quality assessment, and extracted the data. Metaanalyses (fixed or random effects, as appropriate) were used to pool studies' estimates of association. RESULTS: In total, 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Five studies were included in the LBP analysis and seven in the LDD analysis. For the LBP analysis, pooling of the five studies showed that the risk of having LBP for individuals with the highest levels of BMI or weight was almost twice that of people with a lower BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.0; I-2 = 0%). A dose-response relationship was also identified. When genetics and the effects of a shared early environment were adjusted for using a within-pair twin case-control analysis, pooling of three studies showed a reduced but statistically positive association between obesity and prevalence of LBP (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1; I-2 = 0%). However, the association was further diminished and not significant (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.8-2.3; I-2 = 0%) when pooling included two studies on monozygotic twin pairs only. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for LDD. When familial factors were not controlled for, body weight was positively associated with LDD in all five cross-sectional studies. Only two cross-sectional studies investigated the relationship between obesity-related measures and LDD accounting for familial factors, and the results were conflicting. One longitudinal study in LBP and three longitudinal studies in LDD found no increase in risk in obese individuals, whether or not familial factors were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review suggest that genetics and early environment are possible mechanisms underlying the relationship between obesity and LBP; however, a direct causal link between these conditions appears to be weak. Further longitudinal studies using the twin design are needed to better understand the complex mechanisms underlying the associations between obesity, LBP, and LDD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1117
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306): : 224 - 228
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENCY STAT BEHAV SCI
  • [3] [Anonymous], AMA GUIDES EVALUATIO
  • [4] Heritability of low back pain and the role of disc degeneration
    Battie, Michele C.
    Videman, Tapio
    Levalahti, Esko
    Gill, Kevin
    Kaprio, Jaakko
    [J]. PAIN, 2007, 131 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [5] Genetic and Environmental Effects on Disc Degeneration by Phenotype and Spinal Level A Multivariate Twin Study
    Battie, Michele C.
    Videman, Tapio
    Levalahti, Esko
    Gill, Kevin
    Kaprio, Jaakko
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (25) : 2801 - 2808
  • [6] PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD
    BIERINGSORENSEN, F
    [J]. SPINE, 1984, 9 (02) : 106 - 119
  • [7] ABNORMAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SCANS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS - A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION
    BODEN, SD
    DAVIS, DO
    DINA, TS
    PATRONAS, NJ
    WIESEL, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) : 403 - 408
  • [8] The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects - A seven-year follow-up study
    Borenstein, DG
    O'Mara, JW
    Boden, SD
    Lauerman, WC
    Jacobson, A
    Platenberg, C
    Schellinger, D
    Wiesel, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (09) : 1306 - 1311
  • [9] Nature or nurture in low back pain? Results of a systematic review of studies based on twin samples
    Ferreira, P. H.
    Beckenkamp, P.
    Maher, C. G.
    Hopper, J. L.
    Ferreira, M. L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 17 (07) : 957 - 971
  • [10] Obesity and low back pain - Biology, biomechanics and epidemiology
    Flamme C.H.
    [J]. Der Orthopäde, 2005, 34 (7): : 652 - 657