Diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in general practice - a prospective multicenter validation and implementation study

被引:8
作者
Rohde, Jorn [1 ]
Himmel, Wolfgang [2 ]
Hofinger, Clemens [1 ]
Thien-Tri Lam [3 ]
Schrader, Hanna [1 ]
Wallstabe, Julia [3 ]
Kurzai, Oliver [3 ,4 ]
Gagyor, Ildiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Julius Maximilians Univ Wuerzburg, Dept Gen Practice, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Gen Practice, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Julius Maximilians Univ Wuerzburg, Inst Hyg & Microbiol, Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Hans Knoell Inst, Leibniz Inst Nat Prod Res & Infect Biol, Jena, Germany
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2022年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; testing; General practice; Sensitivity and specificity; Attitude of health personnel; Feasibility study; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-022-01756-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background PCR testing is considered the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis but its results are earliest available hours to days after testing. Rapid antigen tests represent a diagnostic tool enabling testing at the point of care. Rapid antigen tests have mostly been validated by the manufacturer or in controlled laboratory settings only. External validation at the point of care, particularly in general practice where the test is frequently used, is needed. Furthermore, it is unclear how well point of care tests are accepted by the practice staff. Methods In this prospective multicenter validation study in primary care, general practitioners included adult individuals presenting with symptoms suggesting COVID-19. Each patient was tested by the general practitioner, first with a nasopharyngeal swab for the point of care test (Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test) and then with a second swab for PCR testing. Using the RT-PCR result as a reference, we calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, with their 95% confidence intervals. General practitioners and medical assistants completed a survey to assess feasibility and usefulness of the point of care tests. Results In 40 practices in Wurzburg, Germany, 1518 patients were recruited between 12/2020 and 06/2021. The point of care test achieved a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 99.5% compared to RT-PCR. With a prevalence of 9.5%, the positive predictive value was 93.9% and the negative predictive value was 97.8%. General practitioners rated the point of care test as a helpful tool to support diagnostics in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive for infection, particularly in situations where decision on further care is needed at short notice. Conclusion The point of care test used in this study showed a sensitivity below the manufacturer's specification (Sensitivity 96.25%) in the practice but high values for specificity and high positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Although widely accepted in the practice, measures for further patient management require a sensitive interpretation of the point of care test results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres [J].
Albert, Eliseo ;
Torres, Ignacio ;
Bueno, Felipe ;
Huntley, Dixie ;
Molla, Estefania ;
Angel Fernandez-Fuentes, Miguel ;
Martinez, Mireia ;
Poujois, Sandrine ;
Forque, Lorena ;
Valdivia, Arantxa ;
Solano de la Asuncion, Carlos ;
Ferrer, Josep ;
Colomina, Javier ;
Navarro, David .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (03) :472.e7-472.e10
[2]  
Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, 2015, THER ENTZ ERK GAUM T
[3]  
Arzteblatt Deutsches, 2021, DEUT ARZTEBLATT
[4]   Point-of-care diagnostics for respiratory viral infections [J].
Basile, Kerri ;
Kok, Jen ;
Dwyer, Dominic E. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 18 (01) :75-83
[5]  
Bfarm, 2021, MED HINW LIST ANT TE
[6]   Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 has acceptable accuracy in symptomatic patients in primary health care [J].
Bulilete, Oana ;
Lorente, Patricia ;
Leiva, Alfonso ;
Carandell, Eugenia ;
Oliver, Antonio ;
Rojo, Estrella ;
Pericas, Pau ;
Llobera, Joan .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (03) :391-398
[7]  
Christina Leuker IL.., 2020, CORONA SCHNELLTESTS
[8]   Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR (Publication with Expression of Concern) [J].
Corman, Victor M. ;
Landt, Olfert ;
Kaiser, Marco ;
Molenkamp, Richard ;
Meijer, Adam ;
Chu, Daniel K. W. ;
Bleicker, Tobias ;
Bruenink, Sebastian ;
Schneider, Julia ;
Schmidt, Marie Luisa ;
Mulders, Daphne G. J. C. ;
Haagmans, Bart L. ;
van der Veer, Bas ;
van den Brink, Sharon ;
Wijsman, Lisa ;
Goderski, Gabriel ;
Romette, Jean-Louis ;
Ellis, Joanna ;
Zambon, Maria ;
Peiris, Malik ;
Goossens, Herman ;
Reusken, Chantal ;
Koopmans, Marion P. G. ;
Drosten, Christian .
EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (03) :23-30
[9]   Evaluation of the diagnostic test for rapid detection of covid-19 antigen (Panbio Covid rapid test) in primary care [J].
Cortes Rubio, J. A. ;
Costa Zamora, M. P. ;
Canals Aracil, M. ;
Pulgar Feio, M. ;
Mata Martinez, A. ;
Carrasco Munera, A. .
MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2021, 47 (08) :508-514
[10]  
Deutsches Insitut fur Normung, 2015, 90012015201509 DIN E