Incorporating structural uncertainty of hydrological models in likelihood functions via an ensemble range approach

被引:6
作者
Tyralla, C. [1 ]
Schumann, A. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Hydrol Water Resources Management & Environm, Bochum, Germany
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2016年 / 61卷 / 09期
关键词
Hydrological modelling; runoff prediction; structural uncertainty; likelihood; ensemble modelling; beta distribution; PARAMETERS; FORECASTS;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2016.1164314
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Model ensembles are possibly the most powerful tool to assess uncertainties in runoff predictions stemming from inadequacies in model structure. But in many applications little knowledge is gained about the specific weaknesses of the individual models. Here we introduce the ensemble range approach (ERA). Compared to other ensemble techniques, ERA is primarily intended to facilitate hydrological reasoning about model structural uncertainty. This is attempted by separate modelling of data uncertainty and structural uncertainty with two different error density functions that are combined in one likelihood function. The width of the structural error density is in accordance with the range of runoff predictions calculated by a small model ensemble at each individual time step. Albeit not the only choice, this study is restricted on the use of a modified beta density to represent structural uncertainty. The performance of ERA is assessed in some synthetic and real data case studies. Ensembles of two structurally identical models are applied, made possible by estimating the parameters of ERA and both models simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:1679 / 1690
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BOBYQA ALGORITHM BOU
[3]   COMBINATION OF FORECASTS [J].
BATES, JM ;
GRANGER, CWJ .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1969, 20 (04) :451-&
[4]  
Bergstrom S., 1997, VANNET NORDEN, V4, P1
[5]   A manifesto for the equifinality thesis [J].
Beven, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) :18-36
[6]   Estimating the uncertain mathematical structure of a water balance model via Bayesian data assimilation [J].
Bulygina, Nataliya ;
Gupta, Hoshin .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[7]   Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes [J].
Clark, Martyn P. ;
Kavetski, Dmitri .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
[8]   Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications [J].
Diks, Cees G. H. ;
Vrugt, Jasper A. .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2010, 24 (06) :809-820
[9]  
Eberle M., 2007, HYDROLOGICAL MODEL 2
[10]   Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding [J].
Fenicia, Fabrizio ;
McDonnell, Jeffrey J. ;
Savenije, Hubert H. G. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (06)