Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector

被引:111
作者
Psarras, Peter C. [1 ]
Comello, Stephen [2 ]
Bains, Praveen [3 ]
Charoensawadpong, Panunya [3 ]
Reichelstein, Stefan [2 ]
Wilcox, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CO2; CAPTURE; PHOTOCATALYTIC CONVERSION; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; COST; MODEL; STEEL; TECHNOLOGIES; STORAGE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.7b01723
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The fabrication and manufacturing processes of industrial commodities such as iron, glass, and cement are carbon-intensive, accounting for 23% of global CO2 emissions. As a climate mitigation strategy, CO2 capture from flue gases of industrial processes-much like that of the power sector- has not experienced wide adoption given its high associated costs. However, some industrial processes with relatively high CO2 flue concentration may be viable candidates to cost-competitively supply CO2 for utilization purposes (e.g., polymer manufacturing, etc.). This work develops a methodology that determines the levelized cost ($/tCO(2)) of separating, compressing, and transporting carbon dioxide. A top-down model determines the cost of separating and compressing CO2 across 18 industrial processes. Further, the study calculates the cost of transporting CO2 via pipeline and tanker truck to appropriately paired sinks using a bottom-up cost model and geo-referencing approach. The results show that truck transportation is generally the low-cost alternative given the relatively small volumes (ca. 100 kt CO2/a). We apply our methodology to a regional case study in Pennsylvania, which shows steel and cement manufacturing paired to suitable sinks as having the lowest levelized cost of capture, compression, and transportation.
引用
收藏
页码:11440 / 11449
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[41]   CO2 capture in pulp and paper mills: CO2 balances and preliminary cost assessment [J].
Möllersten K. ;
Gao L. ;
Yan J. .
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2006, 11 (5-6) :1129-1150
[42]   Techno-Economic Evaluation of Technologies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions at North American Refineries [J].
Motazedi, Kavan ;
Abella, Jessica P. ;
Bergerson, Joule A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) :1918-1928
[43]   Optimal Design and Synthesis of Sustainable Integrated Biorefinery for Pharmaceutical Products from Palm-Based Biomass [J].
Ng S.Y. ;
Ong S.Y. ;
Ng Y.Y. ;
Liew A.H.B. ;
Ng D.K.S. ;
Chemmangattuvalappil N.G. .
Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2017, 1 (02) :135-151
[44]  
Pachauri R. K, 2014, IPCC CLIMATE CHANGE, P25
[45]  
Parsons Worley., 2011, EC ASSESSMENT CARBON
[46]   Levelized Product Cost: Concept and Decision Relevance [J].
Reichelstein, Stefan ;
Rohlfing-Bastian, Anna .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (04) :1653-1682
[47]   Application of advanced technologies for CO2 capture from industrial sources [J].
Romano, Matteo C. ;
Anantharaman, Rahul ;
Arasto, Antti ;
Ozcan, Dursun Can ;
Ahn, Hyungwoong ;
Dijkstra, Jan Wilco ;
Carbo, Michiel ;
Boavida, Dulce .
GHGT-11, 2013, 37 :7176-7185
[48]   Toward Solar Fuels: Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Hydrocarbons [J].
Roy, Somnath C. ;
Varghese, Oomman K. ;
Paulose, Maggie ;
Grimes, Craig A. .
ACS NANO, 2010, 4 (03) :1259-1278
[49]   Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage [J].
Rubin, Edward S. ;
Chen, Chao ;
Rao, Anand B. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (09) :4444-4454
[50]   The cost of CO2 capture and storage [J].
Rubin, Edward S. ;
Davison, John E. ;
Herzog, Howard J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 :378-400