ST. THOMAS AQUINAS ON DEATH AND THE SEPARATED SOUL

被引：24

作者：

Toner, Patrick ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Philosophy, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA

来源：

PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY | 2010年 / 91卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01379.x

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

Since St. Thomas Aquinas holds that death is a substantial change, a popular current interpretation of his anthropology must be mistaken. According to that interpretation - the 'survivalist' view - St. Thomas holds that we human beings survive our deaths, constituted solely by our souls in the interim between death and resurrection. This paper argues that St. Thomas must have held the 'corruptionist' view: the view that human beings cease to exist at their deaths. Certain objections to the corruptionist view are also met.

引用

页码：587 / 599

页数：13

共 27 条

[1]

Stump E., Aquinas, pp. 51-54, (2003)

[2]

Stump E., Resurrection, Reassembly, and Reconstitution: Aquinas on the Soul, Die Menschliche Seele: Brauchen Wir Den Dualismus?

[3]

Brown C., Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus, pp. 120-124, (2005)

[4]

Brown C., Souls, Ships, and Substances, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 81, pp. 655-668, (2007)

[5]

Oderberg D.S., Real Essentialism, (2008)

[6]

Eberl J., Do Human Persons Persist between Death and Resurrection, Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump, (2009)

[7]

Moreland J.P., Rae S., Body and Soul, (2000)

[8]

Hershenov D., A Hylomorphic Account of Personal Identity Thought Experiments, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 82, pp. 481-502, (2008)

[9]

Toner P., Personhood and Death in St. Thomas Aquinas, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 26, pp. 121-138, (2009)

[10]

Toner P., On Hylemorphism and Personal Identity, European Journal of Philosophy

← 1 2 3 →