Public Procurement Efficiency as Perceived by Market Participants: The Case of Russia

被引:7
作者
Balaeva, Olga [1 ]
Rodionova, Yuliya [1 ]
Yakovlev, Andrei [1 ]
Tkachenko, Andrey [1 ]
机构
[1] HSE Univ, Inst Ind & Market Studies, 20 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow 101000, Russia
关键词
Public procurement; efficiency; regulation; COVID-19; suppliers; procurers; CORRUPTION; ALLOCATION; DONATIONS; OFFICER; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1080/01900692.2021.1964083
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This paper studies the indicators of public procurement efficiency as perceived by procurers and suppliers and what barriers must be overcome to consider procurement efficient. The authors used an online survey of Russian procurers and suppliers conducted in 2020 as the main data source. Methods based on comparison of descriptive statistics and distributions of answers for different subsamples were exploited. The analysis reveals that, despite the importance of fighting corruption and increasing competition, most participants consider the supply of high-quality goods and timely contract execution the most important criteria. COVID-19 has mitigated the rigidity of the regulation but exacerbated the ambiguity problem. During the pandemic, contract execution worsened. To improve procurement efficiency, the regulator should clearly specify requirements and consider the main participants' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1167
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Public Procurement in Russia: What Hinders Innovation? [J].
Sirotkina, Nadezhda ;
Pavlovskaya, Svetlana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 41 (5-6) :435-445
[22]   DO E-AUCTIONS REALY IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT? THE CASE OF THE SLOVAK MUNICIPALITIES [J].
Pavel, Jan ;
Sicakova-Beblava, Emilia .
PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2013, 22 (01) :111-124
[23]   Impact of Selected Factors Regarding the Efficiency of Public Procurement (the Case of the Czech Republic) with an Emphasis on Decentralization [J].
Placek, Michal ;
Schmidt, Martin ;
Ochrana, Frantisek ;
Pucek, Milan .
EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2016, 64 (01) :22-36
[24]   Public Supervision of Public Procurement Market: A Contribution to Debate [J].
Szydlo, Wojciech .
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR, ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 :279-288
[25]   EFFICIENCY VERSUS ECONOMY IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT [J].
Nemec, Juraj ;
Sumpikova, Marketa ;
Klazar, Stanislav ;
Grega, Matus .
8TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2014, :1054-1063
[26]   ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EFFICIENCY [J].
Pysmenna, Mariia ;
Pohribna, Nataliia ;
Kalnytska, Maryna .
BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 5 (05) :136-144
[27]   TRANSACTION COSTS IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN RUSSIA: MACROLEVEL ASSESSMENT BASED ON MICRODATA [J].
Balaeva, Olga N. ;
Yakovlev, Anrei A. ;
Rodionova, Yuliya D. ;
Esaulov, Daniil M. .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, 2018, 10 (03) :58-84
[28]   Public Procurement Market and the Municipal Waste Management [J].
Pavel, Jan .
THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC FINANCE 2016, 2016, :172-176
[29]   ENHANCEMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT MARKET IN THE CONTEXT OF RISK REDUCTION [J].
Belokrylova, Olga S. .
TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2016, 14 (04) :73-83
[30]   Analyzing concentration in the Greek public procurement market: a network theory approach [J].
Pliatsidis, Andreas Christos .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2024, 51 (02) :431-480