Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale among hospital staff

被引:24
作者
Lauridsen, Line Skjodt [1 ]
Willert, Morten Vejs [2 ]
Eskildsen, Anita [3 ]
Christiansen, David Hoyrup [3 ]
机构
[1] KIApro, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat Med, Aarhus, Region Midt, Denmark
[3] Reg Hosp West Jutland, Dept Occupat Med, Herning, Denmark
关键词
CD-RISC; Denmark; psychometric properties; internal consistency; construct validity; work-related resilience;
D O I
10.1177/1403494817721056
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) is a brief instrument measuring resilience in adults. The scale has shown sound psychometric properties in different populations and cultures. Our objectives were to cross-culturally adapt the CD-RISC 10 into Danish and to establish the psychometric properties of the Danish version in terms of internal consistency, construct validity and longitudinal validity. Methods: The CD-RISC 10 was translated using established guidelines. Employees (N=272) at hospitals in the Central Denmark Region completed questionnaires at baseline and three months follow-up. Questionnaires included the translated Danish version of the CD-RISC 10 and the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and construct and longitudinal validity by correlating CD-RISC 10 and PSS-10 baseline scores and change scores from baseline to follow-up. Results: The Danish CD-RISC 10 provides acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Analysis of construct validity revealed a negative correlation with the PSS-10 at baseline (r=-.63 [95%CI: -.70; -.55], p<.0001). Analysis of longitudinal validity similarly demonstrated a negative correlation on change scores from baseline to follow-up (r=-.51 [95%CI: -.62; -.39], p<.0001). Conclusions: The scale has acceptable psychometric properties as an instrument for measuring resilience in a Danish-speaking population.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 657
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience [J].
Campbell-Sills, Laura ;
Stein, Murray B. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2007, 20 (06) :1019-1028
[2]   A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERCEIVED STRESS [J].
COHEN, S ;
KAMARCK, T ;
MERMELSTEIN, R .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 24 (04) :385-396
[3]   Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2003, 18 (02) :76-82
[4]   Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish consensus version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale [J].
Eskildsen, Anita ;
Dalgaard, Vita Ligaya ;
Nielsen, Kent Jacob ;
Andersen, Johan Hviid ;
Zachariae, Robert ;
Olsen, Lis Raabaek ;
Jorgensen, Anders ;
Christiansen, David Hoyrup .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2015, 41 (05) :486-490
[5]  
Fayers PM Machin D, 2007, SSESSMENT ANAL INTER
[6]   Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 US Military Veteran Sample [J].
Green, Kimberly T. ;
Hayward, Laura C. ;
Williams, Ann M. ;
Dennis, Paul A. ;
Bryan, Brandon C. ;
Taber, Katherine H. ;
Davidson, Jonathan R. T. ;
Beckham, Jean C. ;
Calhoun, Patrick S. .
ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (04) :443-451
[7]   Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) in young adults [J].
Notario-Pacheco, Blanca ;
Solera-Martinez, Montserrat ;
Serrano-Parra, Maria D. ;
Bartolome-Gutierrez, Raquel ;
Garcia-Campayo, Javier ;
Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
[8]  
Reich J.W., 2010, Handbook for Adult Resilience
[9]  
Sommer D., 2011, DRGANG, V32, P372
[10]   Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline [J].
Sousa, Valmi D. ;
Rojjanasrirat, Wilaiporn .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (02) :268-274