Beyond practitioner and researcher: 15 roles adopted by actors in transdisciplinary and transformative research processes

被引:30
作者
Hilger, Annaliesa [1 ]
Rose, Michael [2 ]
Keil, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wuppertal, Inst Geog & Primary Social & Sci Educ, Gaussstr 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Sustainabil Governance, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Non-scientific actors; Role descriptions; Knowledge co-production; Boundary management; Systematic review; Stakeholder; SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; SCIENCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-021-01028-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To tackle complex sustainability problems, science and practice must join forces and interact in the processes of knowledge co-production. This central claim of sustainability science requires all actors to do more than simply participate in a workshop or carry out traditional research. It is essential to provide clarity to actors about the roles to adopt in these processes, especially in terms of planning collaborations-with whom, when, and how. Therefore, in this paper we identify, describe, and discuss 15 roles for actors involved in such processes. We undertook a systematic literature review to identify papers with precise descriptions of transdisciplinary (td) and transformative (tf) research processes. We focused on the common occurrence of activities undertaken by actors by applying 72 activity codes a total of 549 times. Subclusters of activities were identified by means of a hierarchical cluster analysis and these were condensed into 15 roles. The roles can be categorised in four activity realms: field, academia, boundary management, and knowledge co-production. The roles of the Data Supplier, the Field Expert, and the Application Expert are adopted by actors who originate from the field, whereas the roles of the Scientific Analyst and the Knowledge Collector are primarily adopted by researchers. Furthermore, we identified 10 roles within the activity realms of the knowledge co-production process and boundary management. The high number and diversity of roles, especially in the realm of boundary management, reveals the importance of a comprehensive approach to coordination, communication, and process design.
引用
收藏
页码:2049 / 2068
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DEMESCI: International Journal of Deliberative Mechanisms in Science, DOI DOI 10.4471/DEMESCI.2012.01
[2]  
Biddle B. J., 1979, ROLE THEORY EXPECTAT
[3]   Transdisciplinary research: understanding the stakeholder perspective [J].
Bracken, L. J. ;
Bulkeley, H. A. ;
Whitman, G. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 58 (07) :1291-1308
[4]   The Role of Transacademic Interface Managers in Transformational Sustainability Research and Education [J].
Brundiers, Katja ;
Wiek, Arnim ;
Kay, Braden .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (11) :4614-4636
[5]   Conflicting roles of researchers in sustainability transitions: balancing action and reflection [J].
Bulten, Ellen ;
Hessels, Laurens K. ;
Hordijk, Michaela ;
Segrave, Andrew J. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (04) :1269-1283
[6]   Knowledge systems for sustainable development [J].
Cash, DW ;
Clark, WC ;
Alcock, F ;
Dickson, NM ;
Eckley, N ;
Guston, DH ;
Jäger, J ;
Mitchell, RB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) :8086-8091
[7]   Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse [J].
Chilvers, Jason ;
Longhurst, Noel .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :585-607
[8]  
Dellwing Michael, 2012, Einfuhrung in die interaktionistische Ethnografie Introduction to interactionist ethnography, DOI [10.1007/978-3-531-94265-0, DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-94265-0]
[9]   A close examination of the role and needed expertise of brokers in bridging and building science policy boundaries in environmental decision making [J].
Duncan, Ronlyn ;
Robson-Williams, Melissa ;
Edwards, Sarah .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 6 (01)
[10]  
Efron S.E., 2019, Writing literature review. A practical guide, DOI DOI 10.18296/DOI.ORG/10.18296/EM.0048