Time-varying electricity pricing and consumer heterogeneity: Welfare and distributional effects with variable renewable supply

被引:25
作者
Gambardella, Christian [1 ]
Pahle, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Real-time pricing; Electricity market; Variable renewable generation; Carbon taxation; Welfare analysis; Heterogeneous agents modeling; COMPLEMENTARITY-PROBLEMS; EFFICIENCY; PRICES; GAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Advanced metering infrastructure is being rolled out at large scale in many U.S. and European power markets, allowing for exposing consumers to time-varying electricity prices. The latter is considered crucial for coping with growing variable renewable electricity supply and essential for allocative efficiency in electricity markets. Yet, significant amounts of the potential efficiency gains from time-varying tariffing may be left unrealized, since many residential and commercial retail consumers could actually prefer to stick with the usual default, which is flat tariffing, in order to avoid potential consumption cost increases. We study how increasing variable renewable supply affects individual consumption cost changes from implementing real-time retail pricing among residential consumers, using consumption data from Germany and simulating long-run electricity market equilibria. We find that most customers face comparatively small bill changes at high renewable supply shares. We further analyze how consumer heterogeneity influences the unrealized welfare gains from rejecting real-time pricing. Applying synthetic residential, commercial and industrial demand profiles calibrated to German market data, we find that unrealized welfare gains are 18% to 57% larger, if mostly residential and commercial instead of industrial customers remain flat-priced. The corresponding unrealized welfare gains can more than quadruple to 1.1 bn EUR per year, if renewable supply shares increase. Additionally, targeted rollouts of real-time pricing can entail adverse distributional effects across consumer sectors. Particularly residential consumers can face rate increases, if mainly industrial consumers adopt real-time pricing. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 273
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Allcott H., 2012, Real-time pricing and electricity market design
[2]   Rethinking real-time electricity pricing [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) :820-842
[3]   Who gains from hourly time-of-use retail prices on electricity? An analysis of consumption profiles for categories of Danish electricity customers [J].
Andersen, F. M. ;
Larsen, H. V. ;
Kitzing, Lena ;
Morthorst, P. E. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 3 (06) :582-593
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[5]   Flexibility in Europe's power sector - An additional requirement or an automatic complement? [J].
Bertsch, Joachim ;
Growitsch, Christian ;
Lorenczik, Stefan ;
Nagl, Stephan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 53 :118-131
[6]  
Bollinger B, 2015, 3274 STANF U, P1
[7]  
Borenstein S, 2005, RAND J ECON, V36, P469
[8]   The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing [J].
Borenstein, S .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :93-116
[9]  
Borenstein S, 2007, ENERG J, V28, P131
[10]   Effective and Equitable Adoption of Opt-In Residential Dynamic Electricity Pricing [J].
Borenstein, Severin .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2013, 42 (02) :127-160