Measuring mindfulness? An Item Response Theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale

被引:224
作者
Van Dam, Nicholas T. [1 ]
Earleywine, Mitch [1 ]
Borders, Ashley [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Pomona, NJ USA
关键词
Mindfulness; Item Response Theory; MAAS; Construct validity; Meta-consciousness; Psychometrics; STRESS REDUCTION; FIT INDEXES; BENEFITS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is one of the most popular measures of mindfulness, exhibiting promising psychometric properties and theoretically consistent relationships to brain activity, mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) outcomes, and mediation of MBI effects. The present study investigated the response patterns and scale properties in a large sample of undergraduate students (N = 414) using Item Response Theory analyses. The findings suggest that general statements of "automatic inattentiveness" or "automatic pilot" confer greater statistical information about the underlying latent trait. Evidence of limited abilities to report on mindlessness and of response bias to "mindfulness-absent" items suggests challenges to the construct validity of the MAAS. The current findings, along with preexisting data, suggest that reverse-scoring the scale may be inadequate to represent intentional attention or awareness. Further research is needed to determine which variations, components, and correlates of the numerous operationalizations of mindfulness are theoretically consistent and most salient to positive outcomes, especially in psychopathology. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 810
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[2]  
Baker F., 2001, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
[3]   Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition [J].
Bishop, SR ;
Lau, M ;
Shapiro, S ;
Carlson, L ;
Anderson, ND ;
Carmody, J ;
Segal, ZV ;
Abbey, S ;
Speca, M ;
Velting, D ;
Devins, G .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2004, 11 (03) :230-241
[4]   The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being [J].
Brown, KW ;
Ryan, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) :822-848
[5]  
Brown T.A., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
[6]   Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: A Case of Apples Versus Oranges? [J].
Christopher, Michael S. ;
Charoensuk, Sukjai ;
Gilbert, Brennan D. ;
Neary, Timothy J. ;
Pearce, Kelly L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 65 (06) :590-612
[7]   Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling [J].
Creswell, J. David ;
Way, Baldwin M. ;
Eisenberger, Naomi I. ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2007, 69 (06) :560-565
[8]  
De Ayala R. J., 2009, The theory and practice of item response theory
[9]   APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT WITH POLYCHOTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSE MODELS AND STANDARDIZED INDEXES [J].
DRASGOW, F ;
LEVINE, MV ;
WILLIAMS, EA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 38 (MAY) :67-86
[10]  
Embretson S. E., 2000, Item response theory for psychologists