Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees

被引:69
作者
Nixon, Hilary
Saphores, Jean-Daniel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Dept Planning Policy & Design, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Econ, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] San Jose State Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
recycling financing; electronic waste; principal components analysis; ordered logit;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The growth of electronic waste (e-waste) is of increasing concern because of its toxic content and low recycling rates. The e-waste recycling infrastructure needs to be developed, yet little is known about people's willingness to fund its expansion. This paper examines this issue based on a 2004 mail survey of California households. Using an ordered logit model, we find that age, income, beliefs about government and business roles, proximity to existing recycling facilities, community density, education, and environmental attitudes are significant factors for explaining people's willingness to pay an advanced recycling fee (ARF) for electronics. Most respondents are willing to Support a 1% ARF. Our results suggest that policymakers should target middle-aged and older adults, improve programs in communities with existing recycling centers or in rural communities, and consider public-private partnerships for e-waste recycling programs. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 559
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[3]  
Alreck P.L., 1995, SURVEY RES HDB, V2nd
[4]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[5]   An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: A comparison of payment card and referendum approaches [J].
Blaine, TW ;
Lichtkoppler, FR ;
Jones, KR ;
Zondag, RH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 76 (01) :15-22
[6]  
Bohm P., 1972, European Economic Review, V3, P111, DOI DOI 10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3
[7]   ASSESSING PROPORTIONALITY IN THE PROPORTIONAL ODDS MODEL FOR ORDINAL LOGISTIC-REGRESSION [J].
BRANT, R .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (04) :1171-1178
[8]   Factors influencing farmers' concerns regarding bovine tuberculosis in wildlife and livestock around Riding Mountain National Park [J].
Brook, Ryan K. ;
McLachlan, Stephane M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 80 (02) :156-166
[9]   Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri [J].
Brown, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2003, 18 (04) :213-224
[10]   Waste not or want not? A contingent ranking analysis of curbside waste disposal options [J].
Caplan, AJ ;
Grijalva, TC ;
Jakus, PM .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (2-3) :185-197