Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings

被引:71
|
作者
Eckelman, Matthew J. [1 ]
Brown, Clayton [1 ,2 ]
Troup, Lucas N. [1 ]
Wang, Lizhong [1 ]
Webster, Mark D. [2 ]
Hajjar, Jerome F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 41 Seyon St, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Material reuse; Precast concrete plank; Disassembly; Sustainable structural design; Life cycle assessment; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACTS; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design for Deconstruction (DID) is a design approach that enables reuse of durable building components, including structural materials, across multiple building projects. An important DfD strategy is the use of prefabricated modular building assemblies and reversible connections, in contrast to cast-in-place composite systems that must be demolished at building end-of-life. In this paper we evaluate a novel DID flooring system consisting of pre-cast concrete planks and clamped connections. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of using this DM system are evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) across four impact categories of interest to the building and construction sector including fossil fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions, respiratory effects, and photochemical smog formation. Eight different DM building designs are tested for 0-3 reuses compared with a traditional structural design, with energy and environmental benefits accruing from substitution of avoided structural materials. Designs reflect expected loads and current code requirements, while the additional time required for deconstruction of DM buildings is accounted for in the construction schedules. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate 95% confidence intervals for the results. In general, DID designs result in higher initial (original building) energy use and environmental impacts, but have statistically lower impacts than traditional designs if flooring planks are used at least once. Reusing planks three times as designed decreases impacts by a mean value of of 60-70%, depending on the building configuration and impact category. Energy use and environmental impacts from eventual recycling and/or disposal of the reusable components are significant, and emphasize the relative benefits of reuse over recycling.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Messineo, Antonio
    Beltramo, Riccardo
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 : 556 - 569
  • [42] Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management
    Furuta, Hitoshi
    Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2017, 13 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [43] Contribution of the solar systems to the nZEB and ZEB design concept in Portugal - Energy, economics and environmental life cycle analysis
    Silva, Sandra Monteiro
    Mateus, Ricardo
    Marques, Luis
    Ramos, Marta
    Almeida, Manuela
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 : 59 - 74
  • [44] Distributed Energy Systems: Multi-Objective Design Optimization Based on Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Impacts
    Maharjan, Krisha
    Zhang, Jian
    Cho, Heejin
    Chen, Yang
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (21)
  • [45] Environmental Impacts over the Life Cycle of Residential Buildings Using Different Exterior Wall Systems
    Kahhat, Ramzy
    Crittenden, John
    Sharif, Fariya
    Fonseca, Ernesto
    Li, Ke
    Sawhney, Anil
    Zhang, Peng
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2009, 15 (03) : 211 - 221
  • [46] Empirical analysis of memetic algorithms for conceptual design of steel structural systems in tall buildings
    Kicinger, Rafal
    Arciszewski, Tomasz
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, MECHANICS & CONSTRUCTION, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 140 : 277 - +
  • [47] Combining organizational and product life cycle perspective to explore the environmental benefits of steel slag recovery practices
    Toniolo, Sara
    Marson, Alessandro
    Fedele, Andrea
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 867
  • [48] The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems: An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations
    Miller, Dane
    Doh, Jeung-Hwan
    Panuwatwanich, Kriengsak
    van Oers, Niek
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2015, 16 : 39 - 48
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of the potential environmental benefits of a novel hot forming process in automotive manufacturing
    Raugei, Marco
    El Fakir, Omer
    Wang, Liliang
    Lin, Jianguo
    Morrey, Denise
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 83 : 80 - 86
  • [50] Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings
    Mateus, Ricardo
    Silva, Sandra Monteiro
    de Almeida, Manuela Guedes
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 137 : 82 - 92