Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings

被引:71
|
作者
Eckelman, Matthew J. [1 ]
Brown, Clayton [1 ,2 ]
Troup, Lucas N. [1 ]
Wang, Lizhong [1 ]
Webster, Mark D. [2 ]
Hajjar, Jerome F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 41 Seyon St, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Material reuse; Precast concrete plank; Disassembly; Sustainable structural design; Life cycle assessment; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACTS; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design for Deconstruction (DID) is a design approach that enables reuse of durable building components, including structural materials, across multiple building projects. An important DfD strategy is the use of prefabricated modular building assemblies and reversible connections, in contrast to cast-in-place composite systems that must be demolished at building end-of-life. In this paper we evaluate a novel DID flooring system consisting of pre-cast concrete planks and clamped connections. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of using this DM system are evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) across four impact categories of interest to the building and construction sector including fossil fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions, respiratory effects, and photochemical smog formation. Eight different DM building designs are tested for 0-3 reuses compared with a traditional structural design, with energy and environmental benefits accruing from substitution of avoided structural materials. Designs reflect expected loads and current code requirements, while the additional time required for deconstruction of DM buildings is accounted for in the construction schedules. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate 95% confidence intervals for the results. In general, DID designs result in higher initial (original building) energy use and environmental impacts, but have statistically lower impacts than traditional designs if flooring planks are used at least once. Reusing planks three times as designed decreases impacts by a mean value of of 60-70%, depending on the building configuration and impact category. Energy use and environmental impacts from eventual recycling and/or disposal of the reusable components are significant, and emphasize the relative benefits of reuse over recycling.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Economic and environmental benefits of natural treatment systems for sewage treatment: A life cycle perspective
    Lokhande, Shweta
    Kalbar, Pradip P.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 257
  • [32] Life cycle energy and environmental assessment of alternative exterior wall systems
    Monteiro, H.
    Freire, F.
    PORTUGAL SB10: SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AFFORDABLE TO ALL - LOW COST SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION, 2010, : 777 - 784
  • [33] Life cycle energy and environmental analysis of partition wall systems in the UK
    Broun, Reza
    Menzies, Gillian F.
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2011, 21 : 864 - 873
  • [34] Life-cycle cost structural design optimization of steel wind towers
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    Karlaftis, Matthew G.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 174 : 122 - 132
  • [35] Assessing the environmental benefits of adaptive reuse in historical buildings. A case study of a life cycle assessment approach
    Hu, Ming
    Swierzawskib, Jakub
    SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [36] From Energy Demand Calculation to Life Cycle Environmental Performance Assessment for Buildings: Status and Trends
    Luetzkendorf, Thomas
    Balouktsi, Maria
    ROLE OF EXERGY IN ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, : 703 - 715
  • [37] ENERGY CONSUMPTION, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND EFFECTIVE MEASURES OF GREEN OFFICE BUILDINGS: A LIFE CYCLE APPROACH
    Mao, Guozhu
    Chen, Hao
    Du, Huibin
    Zuo, Jian
    Pullen, Stephen
    Wang, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2015, 10 (04): : 161 - 177
  • [38] Environmental life cycle assessment of wire arc additively manufactured steel structural components
    Shah, Izhar Hussain
    Hadjipantelis, Nicolas
    Walter, Lulu
    Myers, Rupert J.
    Gardner, Leroy
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 389
  • [39] Life-cycle optimal design and energy benefits of centralized cooling systems for data centers concerning progressive loading
    Zhang, Yingbo
    Li, Hangxin
    Wang, Shengwei
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 230
  • [40] Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Light Steel Framed Buildings with Cement-Based Walls and Floors
    Abouhamad, Mona
    Abu-Hamd, Metwally
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 17