Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings

被引:71
|
作者
Eckelman, Matthew J. [1 ]
Brown, Clayton [1 ,2 ]
Troup, Lucas N. [1 ]
Wang, Lizhong [1 ]
Webster, Mark D. [2 ]
Hajjar, Jerome F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 41 Seyon St, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Material reuse; Precast concrete plank; Disassembly; Sustainable structural design; Life cycle assessment; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACTS; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design for Deconstruction (DID) is a design approach that enables reuse of durable building components, including structural materials, across multiple building projects. An important DfD strategy is the use of prefabricated modular building assemblies and reversible connections, in contrast to cast-in-place composite systems that must be demolished at building end-of-life. In this paper we evaluate a novel DID flooring system consisting of pre-cast concrete planks and clamped connections. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of using this DM system are evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) across four impact categories of interest to the building and construction sector including fossil fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions, respiratory effects, and photochemical smog formation. Eight different DM building designs are tested for 0-3 reuses compared with a traditional structural design, with energy and environmental benefits accruing from substitution of avoided structural materials. Designs reflect expected loads and current code requirements, while the additional time required for deconstruction of DM buildings is accounted for in the construction schedules. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate 95% confidence intervals for the results. In general, DID designs result in higher initial (original building) energy use and environmental impacts, but have statistically lower impacts than traditional designs if flooring planks are used at least once. Reusing planks three times as designed decreases impacts by a mean value of of 60-70%, depending on the building configuration and impact category. Energy use and environmental impacts from eventual recycling and/or disposal of the reusable components are significant, and emphasize the relative benefits of reuse over recycling.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) analysis of structural steel members for the environmental impact assessment of steel buildings
    Zygomalas, I.
    Efthymiou, E.
    Baniotopoulos, C. C.
    PORTUGAL SB10: SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AFFORDABLE TO ALL - LOW COST SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION, 2010, : 655 - 662
  • [2] Evaluating the life cycle energy benefits of energy efficiency regulations for buildings
    Crawford, Robert H.
    Bartak, Erika L.
    Stephan, Andre
    Jensen, Christopher A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 63 : 435 - 451
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Systems in Complex Buildings
    Ziebik, A. (andrzej.ziebik@polsl.pl), 1600, Springer Verlag (126):
  • [4] Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of a US industrial symbiosis
    Matthew J. Eckelman
    Marian R. Chertow
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1524 - 1532
  • [5] Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of a US industrial symbiosis
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Chertow, Marian R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (08): : 1524 - 1532
  • [6] Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings
    Hasik, Vaclav
    Anderson, Naomi E.
    Collinge, William O.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Khanna, Vikas
    Wirick, Jason
    Piacentini, Richard
    Landis, Amy E.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) : 1110 - 1119
  • [7] Life cycle energy analysis of residential wooden buildings versus concrete and steel buildings: A review
    Schenk, Daniela
    Amiri, Ali
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8
  • [8] DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEMS DESIGN OPTIMIZATION BASED ON LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS
    Maharjan, Krisha
    Zhang, Jian
    Cho, Heejin
    Chen, Yang
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, ES2022, 2022,
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems
    Ciacci, Luca
    Passarini, Fabrizio
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (22)
  • [10] Energy, economic and environmental benefits of integrating passive design strategies into buildings: A review
    Elaouzy, Y.
    El Fadar, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 167