Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings

被引:81
作者
Eckelman, Matthew J. [1 ]
Brown, Clayton [1 ,2 ]
Troup, Lucas N. [1 ]
Wang, Lizhong [1 ]
Webster, Mark D. [2 ]
Hajjar, Jerome F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 41 Seyon St, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Material reuse; Precast concrete plank; Disassembly; Sustainable structural design; Life cycle assessment; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACTS; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design for Deconstruction (DID) is a design approach that enables reuse of durable building components, including structural materials, across multiple building projects. An important DfD strategy is the use of prefabricated modular building assemblies and reversible connections, in contrast to cast-in-place composite systems that must be demolished at building end-of-life. In this paper we evaluate a novel DID flooring system consisting of pre-cast concrete planks and clamped connections. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of using this DM system are evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) across four impact categories of interest to the building and construction sector including fossil fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions, respiratory effects, and photochemical smog formation. Eight different DM building designs are tested for 0-3 reuses compared with a traditional structural design, with energy and environmental benefits accruing from substitution of avoided structural materials. Designs reflect expected loads and current code requirements, while the additional time required for deconstruction of DM buildings is accounted for in the construction schedules. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate 95% confidence intervals for the results. In general, DID designs result in higher initial (original building) energy use and environmental impacts, but have statistically lower impacts than traditional designs if flooring planks are used at least once. Reusing planks three times as designed decreases impacts by a mean value of of 60-70%, depending on the building configuration and impact category. Energy use and environmental impacts from eventual recycling and/or disposal of the reusable components are significant, and emphasize the relative benefits of reuse over recycling.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AISC, 2017, Why Steel: Sustainability
[2]   Economic and environmental assessment of deconstruction strategies using building information modeling [J].
Akbarnezhad, A. ;
Ong, K. C. G. ;
Chandra, L. R. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 37 :131-144
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NAT HOUS TRAV SURV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AISC 360-10
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Advancing sustainable materials management: 2015 Tables and Figures Assessing Trends in Material Generation, Recycling, Composting, Combustion with Energy Recovery and Landfilling in the United States
[7]   TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 [J].
Bare, Jane .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :687-696
[8]   Quantified Uncertainties in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: What Can Be Concluded? [J].
Beltran, Angelica Mendoza ;
Prado, Valentina ;
Vivanco, David Font ;
Henriksson, Patrik J. G. ;
Guinee, Jeroen B. ;
Heijungs, Reinout .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) :2152-2161
[9]   Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes [J].
Bilec, Melissa ;
Ries, Robert ;
Matthews, H. Scott ;
Sharrard, Aurora L. .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2006, 12 (04) :207-215
[10]   Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management [J].
Butera, Stefania ;
Christensen, Thomas H. ;
Astrup, Thomas F. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 44 :196-205