Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey

被引:25
作者
Bailey, Eleanor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Muhlmann, Charlotte [4 ,5 ]
Rice, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Nedeljkovic, Maja [3 ]
Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Sander, Lasse [6 ]
Calear, Alison L. [7 ]
Batterham, Philip J. [7 ]
Robinson, Jo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Orygen, Locked Bag 10,35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Mental Hlth, John St, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
[4] Mental Hlth Ctr Copenhagen, Danish Res Inst Suicide Prevent, Gentofte Hosp Vej 15,4 Sal, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Norregade 10, DK-1165 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Dept Rehabil Psychol & Psychotherapy, Engelbergerstr 41, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[7] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Mental Hlth Res, Canberra, ACT 2061, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Suicide; Research; Ethics; Internet; MENTAL-HEALTH; INTERVENTION; STUDENTS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-020-00479-1
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background People who are at elevated risk of suicide stand to benefit from internet-based interventions; however, research in this area is likely impacted by a range of ethical and practical challenges. The aim of this study was to examine the ethical issues and practical barriers associated with clinical studies of internet-based interventions for suicide prevention. Method This was a mixed-methods study involving two phases. First, a systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating internet-based interventions for people at risk of suicide, and information pertaining to safety protocols and exclusion criteria was extracted. Second, investigators on the included studies were invited to complete an online survey comprising open-ended and forced-choice responses. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse the data. Results The literature search identified 18 eligible studies, of which three excluded participants based on severity of suicide risk. Half of the 15 suicide researchers who participated in the survey had experienced problems obtaining ethics approval, and none had encountered adverse events attributed to their intervention. Survey respondents noted the difficulty of managing risk in online environments and the limitations associated with implementing safety protocols, although some also reported increased confidence resulting from the ethical review process. Respondents recommended researchers pursue a collaborative relationship with their research ethics committees. Conclusion There is a balance to be achieved between the need to minimise the risk of adverse events whilst also ensuring interventions are being validated on populations who may be most likely to use and benefit from them (i.e., those who prefer anonymity). Further research is required to obtain the views of research ethics committees and research participants on these issues. Dialogue between researchers and ethics committees is necessary to address the need to ensure safety while also advancing the timely development of effective interventions in this critical area.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders [J].
Andersson, Gerhard ;
Titov, Nickolai .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (01) :4-11
[2]   Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: Results of an International Researcher Survey [J].
Andriessen, Karl ;
Reifels, Lennart ;
Krysinska, Karolina ;
Robinson, Jo ;
Dempster, Georgia ;
Pirkis, Jane .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2019, 14 (04) :383-394
[3]   Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers [J].
Andriessen, Karl ;
Reifels, Lennart ;
Krysinska, Karolina ;
Robinson, Jo ;
Dempster, Georgia ;
Pirkis, Jane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (07)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ETH GUID PROV PSYCH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, RED SUIC ID TURK MIG
[6]   Epidemiology of Suicide and the Psychiatric Perspective [J].
Bachmann, Silke .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (07)
[7]   Theoretical and empirical foundations of a novel online social networking intervention for youth suicide prevention: A conceptual review [J].
Bailey, Eleanor ;
Rice, Simon ;
Robinson, Jo ;
Nedeljkovic, Maja ;
Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 238 :499-505
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[9]   E-Health Interventions for Suicide Prevention [J].
Christensen, Helen ;
Batterham, Philip J. ;
O'Dea, Bridianne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (08) :8193-8212
[10]   The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research [J].
Chu, Carol ;
Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M. ;
Stanley, Ian H. ;
Hom, Melanie A. ;
Tucker, Raymond P. ;
Hagan, Christopher R. ;
Rogers, Megan L. ;
Podlogar, Matthew C. ;
Chiurliza, Bruno ;
Ringer, Fallon B. ;
Michaels, Matthew S. ;
Patros, Connor H. G. ;
Joiner, Thomas E., Jr. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2017, 143 (12) :1313-1345