Waste management in Iceland: Challenges and costs related to achieving the EU municipal solid waste targets

被引:7
作者
Oskarsson, Gudmundur Kristjan [1 ]
Agnarsson, Sveinn [2 ]
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akureyri, Fac Business Adm, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Sch Business, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Environm & Nat Resources, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Environm & Life Sci, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Iceland; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Waste management expenditure; Remote areas; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IRKUTSK REGION; SIBERIA; RUSSIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste management in Iceland has developed considerably in recent years. Before 1990, most of the waste was either burnt in open pits or landfilled. In the past, information about waste management in Iceland used to be almost exclusively published in reports and was primarily based on rough estimates. Currently, incinerators and landfilling sites are highly regulated and follow EU legislation. Additionally, reporting has gradually improved and is approaching EU standards, although improvement is still needed. In an international context, Iceland is far behind the other Nordic countries as well as the EU-27 countries in reducing landfill rates and enhancing energy recovery and recycling rates. According to the EU landfill directive, the total amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfilled must be below 10% by 2035; however, it is currently over 60%. Other targets are similarly far off, and it is unlikely that Iceland will meet those in time without immediate and significant changes in waste management. This article aims to evaluate MSW management in Iceland at the national and regional levels, its compliance with the EU's targets for waste management and the associated costs inflicted on municipalities. Hence, annual accounts data were used when comparing regions and municipalities. It was found that there are significant differences in per capita waste management expenditure between municipalities with less than 1,000 inhabitants (euro379) and ones with more than 10,000 inhabitants (euro106). Without changes in proposed future waste management strategies, this gap will inevitably increase in the upcoming years.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]  
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources, 2021, I ATT AD HRINGR STEF
[32]  
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources, 2018, IC 7 NAT COMM 3 BIEN
[33]   The Expanding Footprint of Rapid Arctic Change [J].
Moon, Twila A. ;
Overeem, Irina ;
Druckenmiller, Matt ;
Holland, Marika ;
Huntington, Henry ;
Kling, George ;
Lovecraft, Amy Lauren ;
Miller, Gifford ;
Scambos, Ted ;
Schadel, Christina ;
Schuur, Edward A. G. ;
Trochim, Erin ;
Wiese, Francis ;
Williams, Dee ;
Wong, Gifford .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2019, 7 (03) :212-218
[34]  
National Energy Authority, 2020, OS2020T00801 NAT EN
[35]  
Nordic Competition Authorities, 2016, Competition in the waste management sector-preparing for a circular economy, P190
[36]  
Nordic Council of Ministers,, 2020, NORDIC REGION BEING, DOI [10.6027/politiknord2020-728, DOI 10.6027/POLITIKNORD2020-728]
[37]  
OECD, 2014, OECD ENV PERF REV IC, DOI [10.1787/9789264214200-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264214200-EN]
[38]  
Papineschi J., 2019, NORDIC COUNCIL MINIS, V522, DOI [10.6027/TN2019-522, DOI 10.6027/TN2019-522]
[39]  
Safarian S., 2020, Biophys. Econ. Sustain, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S41247-020-00073-4, 10.1007/s41247-020-00073-4]
[40]   Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland [J].
Safarian, Sahar ;
Unnthorsson, Runar ;
Richter, Christiaan .
ENERGY, 2020, 197