Waste management in Iceland: Challenges and costs related to achieving the EU municipal solid waste targets

被引:7
作者
Oskarsson, Gudmundur Kristjan [1 ]
Agnarsson, Sveinn [2 ]
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akureyri, Fac Business Adm, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Sch Business, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Environm & Nat Resources, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Environm & Life Sci, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Iceland; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Waste management expenditure; Remote areas; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IRKUTSK REGION; SIBERIA; RUSSIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste management in Iceland has developed considerably in recent years. Before 1990, most of the waste was either burnt in open pits or landfilled. In the past, information about waste management in Iceland used to be almost exclusively published in reports and was primarily based on rough estimates. Currently, incinerators and landfilling sites are highly regulated and follow EU legislation. Additionally, reporting has gradually improved and is approaching EU standards, although improvement is still needed. In an international context, Iceland is far behind the other Nordic countries as well as the EU-27 countries in reducing landfill rates and enhancing energy recovery and recycling rates. According to the EU landfill directive, the total amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfilled must be below 10% by 2035; however, it is currently over 60%. Other targets are similarly far off, and it is unlikely that Iceland will meet those in time without immediate and significant changes in waste management. This article aims to evaluate MSW management in Iceland at the national and regional levels, its compliance with the EU's targets for waste management and the associated costs inflicted on municipalities. Hence, annual accounts data were used when comparing regions and municipalities. It was found that there are significant differences in per capita waste management expenditure between municipalities with less than 1,000 inhabitants (euro379) and ones with more than 10,000 inhabitants (euro106). Without changes in proposed future waste management strategies, this gap will inevitably increase in the upcoming years.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]  
Granberg M.E., 2017, 044 NORSK POL, P52
[22]  
Gu8mundsdottir G.F., 2020, GREINING PORF SORPBR, P83
[23]   The divisive and disruptive effect of a weight-based waste fee [J].
Heller, Marit H. ;
Vatn, Arild .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 131 :275-285
[24]  
Icelandic Association of Local Authorities, 2021, MUN ACC SAMB ISL SVE
[25]  
Ingasson H.P., 2021, FORVERKEFNI UNDIRBUN
[26]   WASTE MANAGEMENT IN REMOTE RURAL COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE CANADIAN NORTH: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES [J].
Keske, Catherine M. H. ;
Mills, Morgon ;
Godfrey, Todd ;
Tanguay, Laura ;
Dicker, Jason .
DETRITUS, 2018, 2 :63-77
[27]   Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal [J].
Lebreton, Laurent ;
Andrady, Anthony .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 5 (1)
[28]  
Lee P., 2017, CIRCULAR EC WASTE MA, DOI [10.2861/978568, DOI 10.2861/978568]
[29]  
Meyles C.A, 2006, WASTE MANAGEMENT ICE
[30]  
Meyles C.A., 2003, FORG URG 1970 2003