Waste management in Iceland: Challenges and costs related to achieving the EU municipal solid waste targets

被引:7
作者
Oskarsson, Gudmundur Kristjan [1 ]
Agnarsson, Sveinn [2 ]
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akureyri, Fac Business Adm, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Sch Business, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Environm & Nat Resources, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Environm & Life Sci, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Iceland; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Waste management expenditure; Remote areas; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IRKUTSK REGION; SIBERIA; RUSSIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste management in Iceland has developed considerably in recent years. Before 1990, most of the waste was either burnt in open pits or landfilled. In the past, information about waste management in Iceland used to be almost exclusively published in reports and was primarily based on rough estimates. Currently, incinerators and landfilling sites are highly regulated and follow EU legislation. Additionally, reporting has gradually improved and is approaching EU standards, although improvement is still needed. In an international context, Iceland is far behind the other Nordic countries as well as the EU-27 countries in reducing landfill rates and enhancing energy recovery and recycling rates. According to the EU landfill directive, the total amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfilled must be below 10% by 2035; however, it is currently over 60%. Other targets are similarly far off, and it is unlikely that Iceland will meet those in time without immediate and significant changes in waste management. This article aims to evaluate MSW management in Iceland at the national and regional levels, its compliance with the EU's targets for waste management and the associated costs inflicted on municipalities. Hence, annual accounts data were used when comparing regions and municipalities. It was found that there are significant differences in per capita waste management expenditure between municipalities with less than 1,000 inhabitants (euro379) and ones with more than 10,000 inhabitants (euro106). Without changes in proposed future waste management strategies, this gap will inevitably increase in the upcoming years.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and Own Resources. European Parliament Resolution of 30 May 2018 on the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and Own Resources (2018/2714(RSP))
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REGIONAL PLANNING DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing, and Amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LOCAL GOVT ACT PUB L
[6]   Measuring countries' environmental sustainability performance-The development of a nation-specific indicator set [J].
Cook, David ;
Saviolidis, Nina Maria ;
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur ;
Johannsdottir, Lara ;
Olafsson, Snjolfur .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 74 :463-478
[7]  
Davidsdottir B., 2010, JO ARSPEGILLINN 2010, P1
[8]   An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us? [J].
Dijkgraaf, Elbert ;
Gradus, Raymond .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (03) :501-526
[9]  
Einarsson Niels., 2004, Arctic Human Development Report
[10]   Waste management in Greenland: current situation and challenges [J].
Eisted, Rasmus ;
Christensen, Thomas H. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (10) :1064-1070