Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems

被引:64
作者
Sawant, Amit [1 ]
Dieterich, Sonja [1 ]
Svatos, Michelle [2 ]
Keall, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94394 USA
[2] Varian Med Syst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
MLC tracking; FMEA; quality assurance; commissioning; COLLIMATOR TARGET TRACKING; DMLC MOTION-TRACKING; RADIATION-THERAPY; MULTILEAF-COLLIMATOR; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; MANAGEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; ALGORITHM; ACCURACY; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1118/1.3517837
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and implement a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)-based commissioning and quality assurance framework for dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) tumor tracking systems. Methods: A systematic failure mode and effect analysis was performed for a prototype real-time tumor tracking system that uses implanted electromagnetic transponders for tumor position monitoring and a DMLC for real-time beam adaptation. A detailed process tree of DMLC tracking delivery was created and potential tracking-specific failure modes were identified. For each failure mode, a risk probability number (RPN) was calculated from the product of the probability of occurrence, the severity of effect, and the detectibility of the failure. Based on the insights obtained from the FMEA, commissioning and QA procedures were developed to check (i) the accuracy of coordinate system transformation, (ii) system latency, (iii) spatial and dosimetric delivery accuracy, (iv) delivery efficiency, and (v) accuracy and consistency of system response to error conditions. The frequency of testing for each failure mode was determined from the RPN value. Results: Failures modes with RPN >= 125 were recommended to be tested monthly. Failure modes with RPN <125 were assigned to be tested during comprehensive evaluations, e.g., during commissioning, annual quality assurance, and after major software/hardware upgrades. System latency was determined to be similar to 193 ms. The system showed consistent and accurate response to erroneous conditions. Tracking accuracy was within 3%-3 mm gamma (100% pass rate) for sinusoidal as well as a wide variety of patient-derived respiratory motions. The total time taken for monthly QA was similar to 35 min, while that taken for comprehensive testing was similar to 3.5 h. Conclusions: FMEA proved to be a powerful and flexible tool to develop and implement a quality management (QM) framework for DMLC tracking. The authors conclude that the use of FMEA-based QM ensures efficient allocation of clinical resources because the most critical failure modes receive the most attention. It is expected that the set of guidelines proposed here will serve as a living document that is updated with the accumulation of progressively more intrainstitutional and interinstitutional experience with DMLC tracking. (C) 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3517837]
引用
收藏
页码:6466 / 6479
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, Health Devices, V33, P233
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, COMM TERM CRIT ADV E
  • [3] FIRST DEMONSTRATION OF COMBINED KV/MV IMAGE-GUIDED REAL-TIME DYNAMIC MULTILEAF-COLLIMATOR TARGET TRACKING
    Cho, Byungchul
    Poulsen, Per R.
    Sloutsky, Alex
    Sawant, Amit
    Keall, Paul J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 859 - 867
  • [4] DeRosier Joseph, 2002, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V28, P248
  • [5] Cyberknife image-guided delivery and quality assurance
    Dieterich, Sonja
    Pawlicki, Todd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (01): : S126 - S130
  • [6] IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Burmeister, Jay W.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    LoSasso, Thomas J.
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Molineu, Andrea
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Ramsey, Chester R.
    Salter, Bill J.
    Shi, Jie
    Xia, Ping
    Yue, Ning J.
    Xiao, Ying
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) : 5359 - 5373
  • [7] EVALUATION OF SAFETY IN A RADIATION ONCOLOGY SETTING USING FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    Ford, Eric C.
    Gaudette, Ray
    Myers, Lee
    Vanderver, Bruce
    Engineer, Lilly
    Zellars, Richard
    Song, Danny Y.
    Wong, John
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 852 - 858
  • [8] A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA
    Franceschini, F
    Galetto, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (13) : 2991 - 3002
  • [9] Four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for dynamic tracking using a direct aperture deformation (DAD) method
    Gui, Minzhi
    Feng, Yuanming
    Yi, Byongyong
    Dhople, Anil Arvind
    Yu, Cedric
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (05) : 1966 - 1975
  • [10] A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Dunscombe, Peter B.
    Gibbons, John P., Jr.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Medin, Paul M.
    Mundt, Arno
    Mutic, Sassa
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Thomadsen, Bruce R.
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (01): : S170 - S173