Using specific language to describe risk and probability

被引:124
作者
Patt, AG [1 ]
Schrag, DP
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Lab Geochem Oceanog, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1026314523443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Good assessment of environmental issues, such as climate change, requires effective communication of the degree of uncertainty associated with numerous possible outcomes. One strategy that accomplishes this, while responding to people's difficulty understanding numeric probability estimates, is the use of specific language to describe probability ranges. This is the strategy adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in their Third Assessment Report. There is a problem with this strategy, however, in that it uses words differently from the way lay readers of the assessment typically do. An experiment conducted with undergraduate science students confirms this. The IPCC strategy could result in miscommunication, leading readers to under-estimate the probability of high-magnitude possible outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE 2001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HOW MIND WORKS
[3]  
BREYER S.G., 1993, BREAKING VICIOUS CIR
[4]   VERBAL PROBABILITIES - AMBIGUOUS, CONTEXT-DEPENDENT, OR BOTH [J].
BRUN, W ;
TEIGEN, KH .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1988, 41 (03) :390-404
[5]  
COVELLO V, 1990, COMMUNICATING RISKS, P79
[7]  
Irwin A., 1996, MISUNDERSTANDING SCI, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511563737
[8]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[9]  
KAMMEN D, 1994, J FRANKLIN I A, V331, P97
[10]   Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice [J].
Leiss, W .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1996, 545 :85-94