A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of meloxicam and diclofenac in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine

被引:0
作者
Valat, JP [1 ]
Accardo, S
Reginster, JY
Wouters, M
Hettich, M
Lleu, PL
机构
[1] CHU Trousseau, Serv Rhumatol, F-37044 Tours 1, France
[2] Univ Genoa, DIMI Inst, I-16126 Genoa, Italy
[3] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[4] Brugman Univ Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Boehringer Ingelheim KG, D-6507 Ingelheim, Germany
[6] Boehringer Ingelheim France, Reims, France
关键词
osteoarthritis; lumbar spine; meloxicam;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of meloxicam compared with diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine. Subjects: 229 patients with radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine. Treatment and Methods: Once-daily meloxicam 7.5 mg tablet or diclofenac 100 mg slow release tablet. Efficacy and tolerability parameters were assessed at baseline and after 3, 7 and 14 days of treatment. Results: The two drugs had equal short-term efficacy, with pain on motion of lumbar spine significantly (p < 0.05) decreased at Day 3. Secondary efficacy variables were also significantly improved at Days 3, 7 and 14. There were no statistically significant differences between the two drugs, although the global tolerability of meloxicam was significantly better than for diclofenac, as assessed by the investigators (p = 0.0072) and the patients (p = 0.049). Conclusions: Meloxicam and diclofenac were equivalent in relieving the acute pain associated with osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine. However, meloxicam was much better tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:S30 / S34
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Churchill L., 1996, Inflammopharmacology, V4, P125, DOI 10.1007/BF02735467
[2]  
Dequeker J, 1998, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V37, P946
[3]  
Distel M, 1996, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V35, P68
[4]   PROSTAGLANDIN ENDOPEROXIDE SYNTHETASE ISOENZYMES - THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF SELECTIVE-INHIBITION [J].
FROLICH, JC .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1995, 54 (12) :942-943
[5]   BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA [J].
FRYMOYER, JW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (05) :291-300
[6]   DUODENAL AND GASTRIC-ULCER PREVENTION WITH MISOPROSTOL IN ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TAKING NSAIDS [J].
GRAHAM, DY ;
WHITE, RH ;
MORELAND, LW ;
SCHUBERT, TT ;
KATZ, R ;
JASZEWSKI, R ;
TINDALL, E ;
TRIADAFILOPOULOS, G ;
STROMATT, SC ;
TEOH, LS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (04) :257-262
[7]  
Hawkey C, 1998, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V37, P937
[8]   The gastroenterologist's caseload: Contribution of the rheumatologist [J].
Hawkey, CJ .
SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 26 (06) :11-15
[9]  
Hosie J, 1996, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V35, P39
[10]  
Linden B, 1996, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V35, P35