Artificial intelligence and automated monitoring for assisting conservation of marine ecosystems: A perspective

被引:32
作者
Ditria, Ellen M. [1 ]
Buelow, Christina A. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Rivero, Manuel [2 ]
Connolly, Rod M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Coastal & Marine Res Ctr, Sch Environm & Sci, Australian Rivers Inst, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Australian Inst Marine Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; automation; ecological monitoring; marine conservation; conservation management; machine learning; restoration; LONG-TERM; CITIZEN SCIENCE; BLACK-BOX; DEEP; OPPORTUNITIES; RESTORATION; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2022.918104
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation of marine ecosystems has been highlighted as a priority to ensure a sustainable future. Effective management requires data collection over large spatio-temporal scales, readily accessible and integrated information from monitoring, and tools to support decision-making. However, there are many roadblocks to achieving adequate and timely information on both the effectiveness, and long-term success of conservation efforts, including limited funding, inadequate sampling, and data processing bottlenecks. These factors can result in ineffective, or even detrimental, management decisions in already impacted ecosystems. An automated approach facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) provides conservation managers with a toolkit that can help alleviate a number of these issues by reducing the monitoring bottlenecks and long-term costs of monitoring. Automating the collection, transfer, and processing of data provides managers access to greater information, thereby facilitating timely and effective management. Incorporating automation and big data availability into a decision support system with a user-friendly interface also enables effective adaptive management. We summarise the current state of artificial intelligence and automation techniques used in marine science and use examples in other disciplines to identify existing and potentially transferable methods that can enable automated monitoring and improve predictive modelling capabilities to support decision making. We also discuss emerging technologies that are likely to be useful as research in computer science and associated technologies continues to develop and become more accessible. Our perspective highlights the potential of AI and big data analytics for supporting decision-making, but also points to important knowledge gaps in multiple areas of the automation processes. These current challenges should be prioritised in conservation research to move toward implementing AI and automation in conservation management for a more informed understanding of impacted ecosystems to result in successful outcomes for conservation managers. We conclude that the current research and emphasis on automated and AI assisted tools in several scientific disciplines may mean the future of monitoring and management in marine science is facilitated and improved by the implementation of automation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and Architectures
    Alom, Md Zahangir
    Taha, Tarek M.
    Yakopcic, Chris
    Westberg, Stefan
    Sidike, Paheding
    Nasrin, Mst Shamima
    Hasan, Mahmudul
    Van Essen, Brian C.
    Awwal, Abdul A. S.
    Asari, Vijayan K.
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (03)
  • [2] In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence
    Araujo, Theo
    Helberger, Natali
    Kruikemeier, Sanne
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (03) : 611 - 623
  • [3] Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning for Geneticists
    Azodi, Christina B.
    Tang, Jiliang
    Shiu, Shin-Han
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2020, 36 (06) : 442 - 455
  • [4] Challenges, Benefits, and Opportunities in Installing and Operating Cabled Ocean Observatories: Perspectives From NEPTUNE Canada
    Barnes, Christopher R.
    Best, Mairi M. R.
    Johnson, Fern R.
    Pautet, Lucie
    Pirenne, Benoit
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 38 (01) : 144 - 157
  • [5] The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics
    Barnes, Matthew A.
    Turner, Cameron R.
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2016, 17 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Opening the black box of machine learning in radiology: can the proximity of annotated cases be a way?
    Baselli, Giuseppe
    Codari, Marina
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [7] The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration
    Bayraktarov, Elisa
    Saunders, Megan I.
    Abdullah, Sabah
    Mills, Morena
    Beher, Jutta
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (04) : 1055 - 1074
  • [8] Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption
    Bedue, Patrick
    Fritzsche, Albrecht
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 35 (02) : 530 - 549
  • [9] UAV-derived estimates of forest structure to inform ponderosa pine forest restoration
    Belmonte, Adam
    Sankey, Temuulen
    Biederman, Joel A.
    Bradford, John
    Goetz, Scott J.
    Kolb, Thomas
    Woolley, Travis
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 6 (02) : 181 - 197
  • [10] An unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and Sahel
    Brandt, Martin
    Tucker, Compton J.
    Kariryaa, Ankit
    Rasmussen, Kjeld
    Abel, Christin
    Small, Jennifer
    Chave, Jerome
    Rasmussen, Laura Vang
    Hiernaux, Pierre
    Diouf, Abdoul Aziz
    Kergoat, Laurent
    Mertz, Ole
    Igel, Christian
    Gieseke, Fabian
    Schoning, Johannes
    Li, Sizhuo
    Melocik, Katherine
    Meyer, Jesse
    Sinno, Scott
    Romero, Eric
    Glennie, Erin
    Montagu, Amandine
    Dendoncker, Morgane
    Fensholt, Rasmus
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 587 (7832) : 78 - +