Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering

被引:121
作者
Evans, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiyuan [1 ,2 ]
Renshaw, Mark A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Olds, Brett P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Deiner, Kristy [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Cameron R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Jerde, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lodge, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Pfrender, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Environm Change Initiat, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Southeast Environm Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Ocean Inst, Shrimp Dept, Waimanalo, HI USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] EcoSyst Genet LLC, South Bend, IN USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; CONSERVATION; SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; SEARCH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species richness is a metric of biodiversity that represents the number of species present in a community. Traditional fisheries assessments that rely on capture of organisms often underestimate true species richness. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an alternative tool that infers species richness by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Our objective was to determine how spatial distribution of samples and "bioinformatic stringency" affected eDNA-metabarcoding estimates of species richness compared with capture-based estimates in a 2.2 ha reservoir. When bioinformatic criteria required species to be detected only in a single sample, eDNA metabarcoding detected all species captured with traditional methods plus an additional 11 noncaptured species. However, when we required species to be detected with multiple markers and in multiple samples, eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven of the captured species. Our analysis of the spatial patterns of species detection indicated that eDNA was distributed relatively homogeneously throughout the reservoir, except near the inflowing stream. We suggest that interpretation of eDNA metabarcoding data must consider the potential effects of water body type, spatial resolution, and bioinformatic stringency.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1374
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Bailey R.C., 2004, BIOASSESSMENT FRESHW
  • [2] Bailey R.M., 2004, Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, V192, P1
  • [3] Bayley PB, 2001, T AM FISH SOC, V130, P620, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0620:AATEPO>2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring
    Bohmann, Kristine
    Evans, Alice
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    Creer, Simon
    Knapp, Michael
    Yu, Douglas W.
    de Bruyn, Mark
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (06) : 358 - 367
  • [6] Bonar SA, 2009, STANDARD METHODS FOR SAMPLING NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES, P1
  • [7] Effects of sample size (replicate number) on similarity measures in river benthic Aufwuchs community analysis
    Cao, Y
    Williams, WP
    Bark, AW
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1997, 69 (01) : 107 - 114
  • [8] Chao A., 2005, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, pages, P7907, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471667196.ESS5051, 10.1002/0471667196.ess5051]
  • [9] Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators
    Chao, Anne
    Colwell, Robert K.
    Lin, Chih-Wei
    Gotelli, Nicholas J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (04) : 1125 - 1133
  • [10] Colwell R.K., 2006, ESTIMATES STAT ESTIM