Development of the Recommended Summary Plan for eEmergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT)

被引:41
作者
Hawkes, Claire A. [1 ]
Fritz, Zoe [2 ,3 ]
Deas, Gavin [4 ]
Ahmedzai, Sam H. [5 ]
Richardson, Alison [6 ,7 ]
Pitcher, David [8 ]
Spiller, Juliet [9 ]
Perkins, Gavin D. [1 ,10 ]
Nolan, J. P.
James, Cathryn
Kumar, Dushy Surendra
Ewings, Bob
Fortune, Peter-Marc
Mercer, Mick
Davies, Peter
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, THIS Healthcare Improvement Studies Inst, Cambridge, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Addenbrookes Hosp, Hills Rd, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Clin Res Network, Canc Cluster, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Southampton, Sch Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[7] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, Hants, England
[8] Resuscitat Council UK, 5th Floor,Tavistock House North,Tavistock Sq, London WC1H 9HR, England
[9] Marie Curie Hosp, Edinburgh EH10 7DR, Midlothian, Scotland
[10] NHS Fdn Trust, Univ Hosp Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment; ReSPECT; DNACPR; Treatment escalation plans; Emergency care and treatment plans; Adults; Paediatrics; RESUSCITATION DNACPR ORDERS; DECISION-MAKING; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.003
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation (DNACPR) practice has been shown to be variable and sub-optimal. This paper describes the development of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT). ReSPECT is a process which encourages shared understanding of a patient's condition and what outcomes they value and fear, before recording clinical recommendations about cardiopulmonary-resuscitation (CPR) within a broader plan for emergency care and treatment. Methods: ReSPECT was developed iteratively, with integral stakeholder engagement, informed by the Knowledge-to-Action cycle. Mixed methods included: synthesis of existing literature; a national online consultation exercise; cognitive interviews with users; a patient-public involvement (PPI) workshop and a usability pilot, to ensure acceptability by both patients and professionals. Results: The majority (89%) of consultation respondents supported the concept of emergency care and treatment plans. Key features identified in the evaluation and incorporated into ReSPECT were: The importance of discussions between patient and clinician to inform realistic treatment preferences and clarity in the resulting recommendations recorded by the clinician on the form. The process is compliant with UK mental capacity laws. Documentation should be recognised across all health and care settings. There should be opportunity for timely review based on individual need. Conclusion: ReSPECT is designed to facilitate discussions about a person's preferences to inform emergency care and treatment plans (including CPR) for use across all health and care settings. It has been developed iteratively with a range of stakeholders. Further research will be needed to assess the influence of ReSPECT on patient-centred decisions, experience and health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, COGNITIVE ASPECTS SU
[2]  
Charters E., 2003, J ED RES PRACTICE, V12, P68, DOI DOI 10.26522/BROCKED.V12I2.38
[3]   Documentation of resuscitation decision-making: A survey of practice in the United Kingdom [J].
Clements, Meredith ;
Fuld, Jonathan ;
Fritz, Zoe .
RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (05) :606-611
[4]   Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation orders in acute medical settings: a qualitative study [J].
Cohn, S. ;
Fritz, Z. B. M. ;
Frankau, J. M. ;
Laroche, C. M. ;
Fuld, J. P. .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 106 (02) :165-177
[5]   Systematic review of interventions to improve appropriate use and outcomes associated with do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions [J].
Field, Richard A. ;
Fritz, Zoe ;
Baker, Annalie ;
Grove, Amy ;
Perkins, Gavin D. .
RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (11) :1418-1431
[6]   Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts [J].
Freeman, Karoline ;
Field, Richard A. ;
Perkins, Gavin D. .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (01)
[7]   Development of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a cross-disciplinary approach [J].
Fritz, Zoe ;
Fuld, Jonathan P. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (01) :109-117
[8]   The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care [J].
Fritz, Zoe ;
Malyon, Alexandra ;
Frankau, Jude M. ;
Parker, Richard A. ;
Cohn, Simon ;
Laroche, Clare M. ;
Palmer, Chris R. ;
Fuld, Jonathan P. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09)
[9]   Interpretation and intent: A study of the (mis)understanding of DNAR orders in a teaching hospital [J].
Fritz, Zoe ;
Fulda, Jonathan ;
Haydock, Stephen ;
Palmer, Chris .
RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (09) :1138-1141
[10]   The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation [J].
Goodman, Melody S. ;
Thompson, Vetta L. Sanders .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 7 (03) :486-491