Comparison of second-generation processes for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse to liquid biofuels in terms of energy efficiency, pinch point analysis and Life Cycle Analysis

被引:61
作者
Petersen, A. M. [1 ]
Melamu, Rethabi [2 ]
Knoetze, J. H. [1 ]
Goergens, J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Proc Engn, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Dept Chem Engn, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
Second generation biofuels; Sugarcane bagasse; Life Cycle Assessments; Pinch point; Energy efficiency; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; SSF PROCESSES; SHF; INTEGRATION; ISSUES; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.002
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Three alternative processes for the production of liquid transportation biofuels from sugar cane bagasse were compared, on the perspective of energy efficiencies using process modelling, Process Environmental Assessments and Life Cycle Assessment. Bio-ethanol via two biological processes was considered, i.e. Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation (Process 1) and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (Process 2), in comparison to Gasification and Fischer Tropsch synthesis for the production of synthetic fuels (Process 3). The energy efficiency of each process scenario was maximised by pinch point analysis for heat integration. The more advanced bio-ethanol process was Process 2 and it had a higher energy efficiency at 42.3%. Heat integration was critical for the Process 3, whereby the energy efficiency was increased from 51.6% to 55.7%. For both the Process Environmental and Life Cycle Assessment, Process 3 had the least potential for detrimental environmental impacts, due to its relatively high energy efficiency. Process 2 had the greatest Process Environmental Impact due to the intensive use of processing chemicals. Regarding the Life Cycle Assessments, Process 1 was the most severe due to its low energy efficiency. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 301
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Aden A., 2002, National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing cocurrent dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover, DOI [10.2172/15001119, DOI 10.2172/15001119]
[2]   Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol [J].
Aden, Andy ;
Foust, Thomas .
CELLULOSE, 2009, 16 (04) :535-545
[3]   Heat integration retrofit analysis of a heat exchanger network of a fluid catalytic cracking plant [J].
Al-Riyami, BA ;
Klemes, J ;
Perry, S .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 21 (13-14) :1449-1487
[4]   Comparison of SHF and SSF processes for the bioconversion of steam-exploded wheat straw [J].
Alfani, F ;
Gallifuoco, A ;
Saporosi, A ;
Spera, A ;
Cantarella, M .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 25 (04) :184-192
[5]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DROP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, REF END US STUD COAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], BIOF IND STRAT REP S
[9]  
Aspen Technology Inc, 2008, ASP PLUS
[10]   Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review [J].
Balat, Mustafa .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (02) :858-875