The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD

被引:303
作者
Puhan, M. A. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Chandra, D. [3 ]
Mosenifar, Z. [4 ]
Ries, A. [5 ]
Make, B. [6 ]
Hansel, N. N. [2 ]
Wise, R. A. [2 ]
Sciurba, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Div Pulm Sci & Crit Care Med, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[7] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment; clinical trials; exercise tests; rehabilitation; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEORGES-RESPIRATORY-QUESTIONNAIRE; CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE; WALK DISTANCE; DYSPNEA;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.00063810
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Our aim was to determine the minimal important difference (MID) for 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and maximal cycle exercise capacity (MCEC) in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 1,218 patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial completed exercise tests before and after 4-6 weeks of pre-trial rehabilitation, and 6 months after randomisation to surgery or medical care. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (domain and total scores) and University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (total score) served as anchors for anchor-based MID estimates. In order to calculate distribution-based estimates, we used the standard error of measurement, Cohen's effect size and the empirical rule effect size. Anchor-based estimates for the 6MWD were 18.9 m (95% CI 18.1-20.1 m), 24.2 m (95% CI 23.4-25.4 m), 24.6 m (95% CI 23.4-25.7 m) and 26.4 m (95% CI 25.4-27.4 m), which were similar to distribution-based MID estimates of 25.7, 26.8 and 30.6 m. For MCEC, anchor-based estimates for the MID were 2.2 W (95% CI 2.0-2.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W) and 3.3 W (95% CI 3.0-3.5 W), while distribution-based estimates were 5.3 and 5.5 W. We suggest a MID of 26 +/- 2 m for 6MWD and 4 +/- 1 W for MCEC for patients with severe COPD.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, J THORAC CARDIOVASC, V118, P518
  • [2] Validation of a new dyspnea measure - The UCSD shortness of breath questionnaire
    Eakin, EG
    Resnikoff, PM
    Prewitt, LM
    Ries, AL
    Kaplan, RM
    [J]. CHEST, 1998, 113 (03) : 619 - 624
  • [3] Fishman A, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P2059
  • [4] Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
    Guyatt, GH
    Osoba, D
    Wu, AW
    Wyrwich, KW
    Norman, GR
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (04) : 371 - 383
  • [5] THE ST-GEORGE RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE
    JONES, PW
    QUIRK, FH
    BAVEYSTOCK, CM
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1991, 85 : 25 - 31
  • [6] Kupferberg David H, 2005, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V25, P370, DOI 10.1097/00008483-200511000-00011
  • [7] LACASSE Y, 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4
  • [8] Effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-management programs: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    Staeger, Philippe
    Bridevaux, Pierre-Olivier
    Ghali, William A.
    Burnand, Bernard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 121 (05) : 433 - U125
  • [9] The 6-min walk distance: change over time and value as a predictor of survival in severe COPD
    Pinto-Plata, VM
    Cote, C
    Cabral, H
    Taylor, J
    Celli, BR
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [10] Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD
    Pitta, F
    Troosters, T
    Probst, VS
    Spruit, MA
    Decramer, M
    Gosselink, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (05) : 1040 - 1055