Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from agricultural by-product by Gluconacetobacter strains

被引:40
作者
Soemphol, Wichai [1 ,3 ]
Hongsachart, Piyorot [1 ]
Tanamool, Varavut [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Nong Khai Campus, Muang Nong Khai 43000, Thailand
[2] Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Chem Program, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
[3] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Nat Resources Energy & Environm Res Sect NEE, Nongkhai 43000, Thailand
关键词
bacterial cellulose; crude glycerol; biodiesel; agricultural by-product; acetic aicd bacteria; MICROBIAL CELLULOSE; BIOSYNTHESIS; WASTE; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.036
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is well known as natural biomaterial having a broad range of application. However, the high cost production in term of raw materials and lower yield has limited the applications. In this study, isolation and characterization the newly isolates bacteria from the fermented products was carried out by using non-detoxified crude glycerol as an alternative medium. Based on 16S rRNA, Gluconaceter xylinus BNKC19 was isolated and identified with the highest BC production of 12.31 g/l of dried weight BC from 1% (w/v) of crude glycerol. Increasing of crude glycerol led to decreased production of BC. The results indicated that the impurities in crude glycerol might affect the cell activity. The optimal BC production was found at acidic pH and yeast extract was favorable nitrogen source. Moreover, addition of pineapple peel extract (PPE) into crude glycerol without any supplementation could improve BC production. The structural and morphological properties analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that the crystallinity were slightly higher than that of produced from the commercial sugars. Whereas the cellulose I polymorph showed a lower content of cellulose I beta which might be consistent with a slightly larger microfibril ribbons of BC from the alternative media containing crude glycerol. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11159 / 11168
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes [J].
Castro, Cristina ;
Zuluaga, Robin ;
Putaux, Jean-Luc ;
Caro, Gloria ;
Mondragon, Inaki ;
Ganan, Piedad .
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2011, 84 (01) :96-102
[2]   Effect of impurities in biodiesel-derived waste glycerol on the performance and feasibility of biotechnological processes [J].
Chatzifragkou, Afroditi ;
Papanikolaou, Seraphim .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 95 (01) :13-27
[3]  
Chawla PR, 2009, FOOD TECHNOL BIOTECH, V47, P107
[4]   Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture [J].
Czaja, W ;
Romanovicz, D ;
Brown, RM .
CELLULOSE, 2004, 11 (3-4) :403-411
[5]   The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications [J].
Czaja, Wojciech K. ;
Young, David J. ;
Kawecki, Marek ;
Brown, R. Malcolm, Jr. .
BIOMACROMOLECULES, 2007, 8 (01) :1-12
[6]   Characterization of cellulose and other exopolysaccharides produced from Gluconacetobacter strains [J].
Fang, Lin ;
Catchmark, Jeffrey M. .
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2015, 115 :663-669
[7]   Production of Glyceric Acid by Gluconobacter sp. NBRC3259 Using Raw Glycerol [J].
Habe, Hiroshi ;
Shimada, Yuko ;
Fukuoka, Tokuma ;
Kitamoto, Dai ;
Itagaki, Masayuki ;
Watanabe, Kunihiro ;
Yanagishita, Hiroshi ;
Sakaki, Keiji .
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 73 (08) :1799-1805
[8]  
Hemalatha R., 2013, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, V5, P240
[9]   Production and Characterization of Cellulose by Acetobacter sp V6 Using a Cost-Effective Molasses-Corn Steep Liquor Medium [J].
Jung, Ho-Il ;
Lee, O-Mi ;
Jeong, Jin-Ha ;
Jeon, Young-Dong ;
Park, Ki-Hyun ;
Kim, Hong-Sung ;
An, Won-Gun ;
Son, Hong-Joo .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 162 (02) :486-497
[10]  
Keshk S.M., 2014, Journal of Bioprocessing Biotechniques, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.4172/2155-9821.1000150