Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review

被引:60
作者
Osman, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Schick-Makaroff, Kara [2 ]
Thompson, Stephanie [1 ]
Bialy, Liza [3 ,4 ]
Featherstone, Robin [3 ,4 ]
Kurzawa, Julia [1 ]
Zaidi, Deenaz [1 ]
Okpechi, Ikechi [5 ]
Habib, Syed [1 ]
Shojai, Soroush [1 ]
Jindal, Kailash [1 ]
Braam, Branko [1 ]
Keely, Erin [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Liddy, Clare [9 ,10 ]
Manns, Braden [11 ,12 ]
Tonelli, Marcello [11 ]
Hemmelgarn, Brenda [11 ,12 ]
Klarenbach, Scott [1 ]
Bello, Aminu K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Alberta Res Ctr Hlth Evidence, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Knowledge Translat Platform, Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Cape Town, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Ottawa Hosp, Div Endocrinol Metab, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Ottawa Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Ottawa, Dept Family Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] Bruyere Res Inst, CT Lamont Primary Healthcare Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[12] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
WEB-BASED CONSULTATION; IMPROVE ACCESS; CONSOLIDATED FRAMEWORK; PROVIDERS EXPERIENCES; WAIT TIMES; HEALTH; SYSTEM; IMPACT; TELECONSULTATION; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001629
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Electronic consultation (eConsult)provider-to-provider electronic asynchronous exchanges of patient health information at a distance-is emerging as a potential tool to improve the interface between primary care providers and specialists. Despite growing evidence that eConsult has clinical benefits, it is not widely adopted. We investigated factors influencing the adoption and implementation of eConsult services. Methods We applied established methods to guide the review, and the recently published Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews to report our findings. We searched five electronic databases and the grey literature for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles and full texts to identify studies that reported barriers to and/or facilitators of eConsult (asynchronous (store-and-forward) use of telemedicine to exchange patient health information between two providers (primary and secondary) at a distance using secure infrastructure). We extracted data on study characteristics and key barriers and facilitators were analysed thematically and classified using the Quadruple Aim framework taxonomy. No date or language restrictions were applied. Results Among the 2579 publications retrieved, 130 studies met eligibility for the review. We identified and summarised key barriers to and facilitators of eConsult adoption and implementation across four domains: provider, patient, healthcare system and cost. Key barriers were increased workload for providers, privacy concerns and insufficient reimbursement for providers. Main facilitators were remote residence location, timely responses from specialists, utilisation of referral coordinators, addressing medicolegal concerns and incentives for providers to use eConsult. Conclusion There are multiple barriers to and facilitators of eConsult adoption across the domains of Quadruple Aim framework. Our findings will inform the development of practice tools to support the wider adoption and scalability of eConsult implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Ackerman S, 2014, J GEN INTERN MED, V29, pS3
[2]  
Ackerman SL, 2017, J GEN INTERN MED, V32, pS144
[3]  
Anderson B, 2008, ASIA-PAC J-JPN FOCU, V6
[4]   Impact of e-Consults on Return Visits of Primary Care Patients [J].
Angstman, Kurt B. ;
Rohrer, James E. ;
Adamson, Steven C. ;
Chaudhry, Rajeev .
HEALTH CARE MANAGER, 2009, 28 (03) :253-257
[5]   Provider Satisfaction With Virtual Specialist Consultations in a Family Medicine Department [J].
Angstman, Kurt B. ;
Adamson, Steven C. ;
Furst, Joseph W. ;
Houston, Margaret S. ;
Robrer, James E. .
HEALTH CARE MANAGER, 2009, 28 (01) :14-18
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AMIA ANN S P
[7]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[8]  
Athukorala K., 2013, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V50, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1002/MEET.14505001041, 10.1002/meet.14505001041]
[9]   Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt [J].
Atkins, Salla ;
Lewin, Simon ;
Smith, Helen ;
Engel, Mark ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Volmink, Jimmy .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[10]   An Internet otolaryngology referral center: A preliminary report [J].
Baum, ED ;
Becker, DG ;
Kennedy, DW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2003, 17 (05) :251-256