Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study

被引:56
作者
Dos Santos, F. [1 ]
Drymiotou, S. [2 ]
Martin, A. Antequera [3 ]
Mol, B. W. [4 ]
Gale, C. [5 ]
Devane, D. [6 ]
van't Hooft, J. [7 ]
Johnson, M. J. [8 ,9 ]
Hogg, M. [10 ]
Thangaratinam, S. [11 ]
机构
[1] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Obstet & Gynaecol, Hlth Educ England London, Royal London Hosp, Ward 6F,Whitechapel Rd, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Obstet & Gynaecol ST2, Hlth Educ England London, Royal London Hosp, London, England
[3] Princesa Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Madrid, Spain
[4] Monash Univ, Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Imperial Coll London, Neonatal Med, London, England
[6] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Midwifery, HRB Trials Methodol Res Network, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Galway, Ireland
[7] Acad Med Ctr, Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Neonatal Med, Princess Anne Hosp, Southampton, Hants, England
[9] Univ Southampton, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, Hants, England
[10] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, London, England
[11] Queen Mary Univ London, Maternal & Perinatal Hlth, Womens Hlth Res Unit, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent,Barts Hlth NHS Trus, London, England
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Core outcome set; CROWN; induction of labour;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.15397
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Design To develop a set of core outcomes to be minimally reported in trials on induction of labour. Two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting. Population Methods Four stakeholder groups: midwives, obstetricians, neonatologists, and women's representatives. Protocol registered with COMET (Registration Number: 695). Stakeholders rated reported outcomes for importance (1-limited to 9-critical). The median rating of each outcome was calculated. The consensus criteria to include outcomes were as follows: >= 70% participants rated outcomes as critical and <15% rated outcomes as limited importance. Outcomes that did not achieve consensus were taken to round two and, if there was still no consensus, to the final consensus meeting. Main outcome measures Results Outcomes in trials of induction of labour. Of the 159 invited participants, 54% (86/159) completed the first round, and 83% completed the second round (71/86). The core outcome set included 28 core outcomes in four domains: Short-term maternal outcomes (n = 18)-cardiorespiratory arrest, damage to internal organs, death, haemorrhage, hysterectomy, infection, intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, mode of delivery, need for more than one induction agent, oxytocin augmentation, postnatal depression, pulmonary embolus, satisfaction with care, stroke, time from induction to delivery, uterine hyperstimulation, uterine scar dehiscence/rupture; short-term offspring outcomes (n = 8)-admission to the neonatal unit, birth trauma, death, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy/need for therapeutic hypothermia, meconium aspiration syndrome, need for respiratory support, infection, and seizures; long-term ma bbternal outcomes (n = 1)-operative pelvic floor repair; long-term offspring outcomes (n = 1)-disability including neurodevelopmental delay. Conclusion Tweetable abstract Trials on induction of labour should include this core outcome set to standardise reporting. International multistakeholder Delphi study identifies a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1680
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Development of a core outcome set for epilepsy in pregnancy (E-CORE): a national multi-stakeholder modified Delphi consensus study
    Al Wattar, B. H.
    Tamilselvan, K.
    Khan, R.
    Kelso, A.
    Sinha, A.
    Pirie, A. M.
    McCorry, D.
    Khan, K. S.
    Thangaratinam, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (04) : 661 - 667
  • [2] [Anonymous], BJOG
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, TRIALS, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13063-017-1788-8
  • [4] Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Crofford, Leslie J.
    Mease, Philip J.
    Burgess, Somali Misra
    Palmer, Susan C.
    Abetz, Linda
    Martin, Susan A.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (01) : 114 - 120
  • [5] Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
    Chalmers, Iain
    Glasziou, Paul
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 374 (9683) : 86 - 89
  • [6] Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
    Clarke, Mike
    [J]. TRIALS, 2007, 8 (1)
  • [7] Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy - where to from here?
    Davidson, Joanne O.
    Wassink, Guido
    van den Heuij, Lotte G.
    Bennet, Laura
    Gunn, Alistair J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [8] Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review
    Duffy, J. M. N.
    Rolph, R.
    Gale, C.
    Hirsch, M.
    Khan, K. S.
    Ziebland, S.
    McManus, R. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (10) : 1481 - 1489
  • [9] GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Kunz, Regina
    Atkins, David
    Brozek, Jan
    Vist, Gunn
    Alderson, Philip
    Glasziou, Paul
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 395 - 400
  • [10] MOMENT - Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
    Harman, Nicola L.
    Bruce, Iain A.
    Callery, Peter
    Tierney, Stephanie
    Sharif, Mohammad Owaise
    O'Brien, Kevin
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14