Linking scientific research and energy innovation: A comparison of clean and dirty technologies

被引:7
作者
Perrons, Robert K. [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam B. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Trinh Le [4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Strategy & Performance, Cambridge, England
[3] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Motu Econ & Publ Policy Res, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
Energy innovation; Patents; Bibliographic data; Knowledge translation; Clean technology; Dirty technology;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the urgent case for bringing new energy technologies to the marketplace, the delivery of these innovations has been frustratingly slow, often taking several decades to develop even the most promising ideas into novel technologies that achieve a significant amount of market penetration. The pathway for delivering new energy technologies is frequently discussed in the literature in a vague and aggregated way, but innovation tends to consist of a series of partially overlapping processes consisting of: (1) the production of scientific and technological knowledge, (2) the translation of that knowledge into working technologies or artifacts, and (3) the introduction of the artifacts into the marketplace, where they are matched with users' requirements. However, relatively little data is available showing how long each of these processes takes for energy technologies. Here we combine information from patent applications with bibliographic data to shine light on the second process-that is, the translation of scientific knowledge into working prototypes. Our results show that energy technologies take an average of approximately 10 years to pass through this phase. These findings will help policymakers to devise more effective mechanisms and strategies for accelerating the overall rate of technological change in this domain.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anadon LD, 2014, TRANSFORMING U.S. ENERGY INNOVATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107338890
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Transforming Energy: Solving Climate Change with Technology Policy
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LIM MAGN FUT CLIM CH
[5]   Investigating the antecedents of general purpose technologies: A patent perspective in the green energy field [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo ;
Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni ;
Albino, Vito .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 39 :81-100
[6]  
Bosetti V., 2013, 43 FOND ENR MATT 43 FOND ENR MATT
[7]  
Deutch J.M., 2011, CRISIS ENERGY POLICY
[8]  
Deutch JohnM., 2004, MAKING TECHNOLOGY WO
[9]  
Grubler A, 2014, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION: LEARNING FROM HISTORICAL SUCCESSES AND FAILURES, P1
[10]   Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales [J].
Grubler, Arnulf .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :8-16