共 13 条
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up
被引:40
作者:
Tomita, Yoshihiko
[1
,2
]
Kondo, Tsunenori
[3
]
Kimura, Go
[4
]
Inoue, Takamitsu
[5
]
Wakumoto, Yoshiaki
[6
]
Yao, Masahiro
[7
]
Sugiyama, Takayuki
[8
]
Oya, Mototsugu
[9
]
Fujii, Yasuhisa
[10
]
Obara, Wataru
[11
]
Motzer, Robert J.
[12
]
Uemura, Hirotsugu
[13
]
机构:
[1] Niigata Univ, Dept Urol, Asahimachi 1-757, Niigata 9518510, Japan
[2] Yamagata Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Yamagata, Japan
[3] Tokyo Womens Med Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Nippon Med Coll Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Akita Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Akita, Japan
[6] Juntendo Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Yokohama City Univ Med, Dept Urol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[8] Hamamatsu Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[9] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[10] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Urol, Univ Hosp Med, Tokyo, Japan
[11] Iwate Med Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[12] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[13] Kinki Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Osakasayama, Japan
关键词:
advanced renal cell carcinoma;
first-line treatment;
nivolumab;
ipilimumab;
Japanese;
THERAPIES;
D O I:
10.1093/jjco/hyz132
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib (SUN) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214, with a manageable safety profile. We report efficacy and safety with extended follow-up amongst Japanese patients. Methods CheckMate 214 patients received NIVO (3 mg/kg) plus IPI (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, then NIVO (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks; or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). This subgroup analysis assessed overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate/poor-risk and intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and safety (ITT patients). Results Of 550 and 546 patients randomized to NIVO+IPI and SUN, 38 and 34, respectively, were Japanese. Of these, 31 (NIVO+IPI) and 29 (SUN) patients were IMDC intermediate/poor-risk. In IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients with 30 months' minimum follow-up, there was a delayed trend in OS benefit with NIVO+IPI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.59; P = 0.2670), and 24-month OS probability favoured NIVO+IPI (84%) versus SUN (76%). The ORR was 39% with NIVO+IPI and 31% with SUN (P = 0.6968). PFS was similar in both treatment arms (HR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.62-2.20; P = 0.6220). Efficacy in ITT patients was similar to IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event incidence was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (58 versus 91%). Conclusions Japanese patients with untreated aRCC in the NIVO+IPI arm had a numerically higher ORR and improved safety profile versus patients in the SUN arm. A delayed OS benefit appears to be emerging with NIVO+IPI. Longer follow-up is needed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231749?term=NCT02231749&rank=1 identifier: NCT02231749.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文