Decision-Making Methodology for Risk Management Applied to Imja Lake in Nepal

被引:10
作者
Cuellar, Amanda D. [1 ]
McKinney, Daene C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
WATER | 2017年 / 9卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
glacial lake outburst flood; risk management; decision making; Imja Lake; data envelopment analysis; decision analysis; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GLACIAL LAKE; OUTBURST FLOOD; CATASTROPHIC DRAINAGE; EVEREST REGION; HIMALAYA; HAZARD; TSHO; PERSPECTIVE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/w9080591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Glacial retreat causes the formation of glacier lakes with the potential of producing glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). Imja Lake in Nepal is considered at risk for a GLOF. Communities in the path of a potential Imja GLOF are implementing adaptation projects, yet no quantitative data or guidance is available to understand the benefits of these projects or how to weigh benefits against the cost of implementation. We develop and demonstrate a decision-making methodology for GLOF risk management, incorporating available scientific information and uncertainty. The methodology consists of (1) identifying flooding scenarios, (2) evaluating scenario consequences, and (3) performing an economic analysis of proposed adaptation projects. The methodology is applied to assess benefits in Dingboche of lowering Imja Lake by 3, 10 and 20 m. The results show that the baseline case (no lake lowering) has the lowest expected cost because of low valuation of agricultural land and homes in the literature. Nonetheless, the result is sensitive to changes in the analysis variables. We also found that lowering the lake by 10 or 20 m is efficient according only to the methodology used here; however, considering only direct economic damages and literature cost estimates, the costs outweigh the benefits for these projects.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making framework for sustainability-related supply chain risk management
    Hsu, Ming-Fu
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 200
  • [2] Decision-making framework methodology: an original approach to project risk management in new product design
    Gidel, T
    Gautier, R
    Duchamp, R
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 16 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [3] Safety management and decision-making system based on risk management
    Changjian, Wang
    Progress in Mining Science and Safety Technology, Pts A and B, 2007, : 2280 - 2283
  • [4] Nurse manager risk information management for decision-making: A qualitative analysis
    Islam, Tasneem
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    Bucknalla, Tracey K.
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (04) : 401 - 407
  • [5] Decision-making of banks on credit for SMEs under risk management: New methodology and application
    Zhang, Chen
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhu, Weidong
    Wu, Yong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2007, 2 : 92 - 97
  • [6] The Application of Utility Theory in the Decision-Making of Marketing Risk Management
    Shi, Gonglong
    Wang, Qian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION (IAFSM 2018), 2018, 62 : 303 - 310
  • [7] Risk management - a Romanian approach in optimizing decision-making process
    Petrescu, Marius
    Popescu, Delia Mioara
    Sirbu, Nicoleta
    BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 1025 - 1032
  • [8] A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain
    Xia, De
    Chen, Bo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) : 4957 - 4966
  • [9] Physiology of Risk-Taking and Risk Management in Realistic Decision-Making Scenarios
    Crivelli, Davide
    Allegretta, Roberta A.
    Balconi, Michela
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2024,
  • [10] Methodology foundations of decision-making concerning balanced management of manufacturing
    Khorolskyi, Valentyn
    Rybalko, Liudmyla
    Purij, Ganna
    Khorolska, Olena
    ECONOMIC ANNALS-XXI, 2016, 160 (7-8): : 45 - 50