Is a multiple supply chain management perspective a new way to manage global supply chains toward sustainability?

被引:14
作者
Brandao, Maicom Sergio [2 ]
Godinho-Filho, Moacir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Business Sch, Dept Supply Chain Management & Decis Sci, Metis Lab, Le Havre, France
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Grad Program Ind Engn, Sao Carlos, Brazil
关键词
Supply chain management; Global supply chains; Entire supply chain; Multiple supply chains; Sustainability; COLLABORATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The imperative for building a sustainable future depends on how organizations manage their supply chains, which are responsible for processing raw materials into finished products. Recently, a new trend has been emerging in some companies, considering not only an entire supply chain but several supply chains inside the organization. This way of approaching sustainability, by focusing on several supply chains, can be called a multiple supply chain perspective, and professionals' interest in this context has been growing. This study aims to explore essential components needed to manage multiple supply chains toward sustainability from a focal company perspective. Sustainability reports from 25 companies leaders in supply chain management are analyzed using content analysis and correspondence analysis. As a result, a conceptual model is proposed, considering four essential components: supply chain processes; relational mechanisms; monitoring and control mechanisms; and sustainability outcomes. Based on this conceptual model, six propositions are elaborated to be further empirically explored in the literature. The proposed conceptual model helps supply chain and sustain -ability managers to improve their efforts toward sustainability by revealing what components are needed to manage each different supply chain and by helping to create more focused strategies that are effective in different scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 100 条
[21]  
Cooper M.C., 1997, International Journal of Logistics Management, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.1108/09574099710805556
[22]   Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Correia, Elisabete ;
Carvalho, Helena ;
Azevedo, Susana G. ;
Govindan, Kannan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)
[23]   Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review [J].
Dania, Wike Agustin Prima ;
Xing, Ke ;
Amer, Yousef .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 186 :851-864
[24]  
Day R., 2004, ACCOUNT FORUM, V28, P43, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ACCFOR.2004.04.003
[25]  
Diageo, 2020, DIAG SUST RESP PERF
[26]  
Pimenta HCD, 2014, IFIP ADV INF COMM TE, V439, P213
[27]   Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains [J].
Ding, Baoyang .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2018, 119 :115-130
[28]   Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Performance in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework [J].
Duque-Uribe, Veronica ;
Sarache, William ;
Valentina Gutierrez, Elena .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
[29]   Anti-refugee Mobilization in Social Media: The Case of Soldiers of Odin [J].
Ekman, Mattias .
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2018, 4 (01)
[30]   The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value [J].
Ellinger, Alexander ;
Shin, Hyunju ;
Northington, William Magnus ;
Adams, Frank G. ;
Hofman, Debra ;
O'Marah, Kevin .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (03) :249-262