Comprehensive Assessment of Aortic Compliance and Brachial Endothelial Function Using 3.0-T High-Resolution MRI: A Feasibility Study

被引:6
作者
Shan, Yan
Lin, Jiang [1 ]
Xu, Pengju
Zhou, Jianjun
Zeng, Mengsu
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
arterial compliance; pulse wave velocity; endothelial function; aorta; magnetic resonance imaging; PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825b823e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of one-stop examination of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), aortic distensibility (AD), and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy volunteers by means of 3.0-T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 32 healthy volunteers (24-37 years old; mean age, 29 years) underwent repeated high-resolution MRI to assess aortic PWV, ascending aorta (AA) AD, proximal descending aorta (PDA) AD, distal descending aorta (DDA) AD, and FMD of the brachial artery with an interval of 1 to 2 hours. Pulse wave velocity was evaluated by 2-dimensional (2D) phase contrast velocity-encoded MRI with a 4.7- to 7.8-millisecond (ms) temporal resolution. Fiesta-cine MRI was used to assess AD and FMD with a 18.75- to 31.25-ms temporal resolution. The image quality of repeated scans was evaluated with 4-point scores, and the agreement between the 2 scans was tested with kappa analysis. The reproducibility of the results from repeated measurements for PWV, AA-AD, PDA-AD, DDA-AD, and FMD was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. The method of Bland-Altman plot was also used to assess the agreement between repeated measurements. Results: Each examination including PWV, AD, and FMD were completed in approximately half an hour. The image quality between repeated scans showed good agreement (kappa value, 0.776) with a mean score of 3.53 and 3.41, respectively. Reproducibility between repeated measurements was high for aortic PWV (4.33 +/- 0.88 vs 4.36 +/- 0.88 m/s; ICCPWV = 0.95; P < 0.01), AA-AD (8.60 +/- 3.11 vs 8.59 +/- 3.10 x 10(-3) mm Hg-1; ICCAA-AD = 0.97; P < 0.01), PDA-AD (6.95 +/- 2.44 vs 6.95 +/- 2.42 x 10(-3) mm Hg-1; ICCPDA-AD = 0.99; P < 0.01), DDA (10.54 +/- 2.91 vs 10.55 +/- 2.90 x 10(-3) mm Hg-1; ICCDDA-AD = 0.98, P < 0.01), and FMD (24.94 +/- 12.55 vs 24.92 +/- 12.38%; ICCFMD = 0.94, P < 0.01). Good agreement between repeated measurements was found for aortic PWV (confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to 0.50), AA-AD (CI, -0.11 to 0.12), PDA-AD (CI, -0.08 to 0.08), DDA-AD (CI, -0.23 to 0.21), and FMD (CI, -1.46 to 1.51). Conclusion: Comprehensive assessment of aortic compliance and brachial endothelial function can be achieved in a single examination using 3.0-T high-resolution MRI with good reproducibility and within a reasonable amount of time.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Acevedo-Bolton G, 2010, JOINT ANN M ISMRM ES
[2]   Comparison of aortic elasticity determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in obese versus lean adults [J].
Danias, PG ;
Tritos, NA ;
Stuber, M ;
Botnar, RM ;
Kissinger, KV ;
Manning, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) :195-199
[3]  
Glasser S P, 2000, Heart Dis, V2, P375
[4]   Risk stratification for postoperative cardiovascular events via noninvasive assessment of endothelial function - A prospective study [J].
Gokce, N ;
Keaney, JF ;
Hunter, LM ;
Watkins, MT ;
Menzoian, JO ;
Vita, JA .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (13) :1567-1572
[5]   Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI [J].
Grotenhuis, Heynric B. ;
Westenberg, Jos M. ;
Steendijk, Paul ;
van der Geest, Rob J. ;
Ottenkamp, Jaap ;
Bax, Jeroen J. ;
Jukema, J. Wouter ;
de Roos, Albert .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) :521-526
[6]   Prognostic value of coronary vascular endothelial dysfunction [J].
Halcox, JPJ ;
Schenke, WH ;
Zalos, G ;
Mincemoyer, R ;
Prasad, A ;
Waclawiw, MA ;
Nour, KRA ;
Quyyumi, AA .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (06) :653-658
[7]   Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques [J].
Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. ;
Johnson, Kevin R. ;
Miller, Alan B. ;
Shaffer, Jean M. ;
White, Richard D. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2010, 12
[8]   Noninvasive atherosclerosis imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions [J].
Jacoby D.S. ;
Mohler III E.R. ;
Rader D.J. .
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2004, 6 (1) :20-26
[9]   In vitro validation of rapid MR measurement of wave velocity [J].
Kraft, KA ;
Fatouros, PP ;
Corwin, FD ;
Fei, DY .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1997, 126 (01) :103-109
[10]   Feasibility of aortic pulse pressure and pressure wave velocity MRI measurement in young adults [J].
Laffon, E ;
Marthan, R ;
Montaudon, M ;
Latrabe, V ;
Laurent, F ;
Ducassou, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 21 (01) :53-58