Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model

被引:169
|
作者
Hanninen, Maria [1 ]
Kujala, Pentti [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Appl Mech, Kotka Maritime Res Ctr, FI-48100 Kotka, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Dept Appl Mech, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
关键词
Maritime accidents; Bayesian networks; Sensitivity analysis; Mutual information; Causation probability; ORGANIZATIONAL-FACTORS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2012.02.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The influences of the variables in a Bayesian belief network model for estimating the role of human factors on ship collision probability in the Gulf of Finland are studied for discovering the variables with the largest influences and for examining the validity of the network. The change in the so-called causation probability is examined while observing each state of the network variables and by utilizing sensitivity and mutual information analyses. Changing course in an encounter situation is the most influential variable in the model, followed by variables such as the Officer of the Watch's action, situation assessment, danger detection, personal condition and incapacitation. The least influential variables are the other distractions on bridge, the bridge view, maintenance routines and the officer's fatigue. In general, the methods are found to agree on the order of the model variables although some disagreements arise due to slightly dissimilar approaches to the concept of variable influence. The relative values and the ranking of variables based on the values are discovered to be more valuable than the actual numerical values themselves. Although the most influential variables seem to be plausible. there are some discrepancies between the indicated influences in the model and literature. Thus, improvements are suggested to the network. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 40
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analyzing and Predicting Forestry Accountancy Network Variables with Bayesian Belief Networks as Compared to Traditional Analyzing Methods
    Hartebrodt, Christoph
    Aichholz, Reinhard
    Braasch, Marco
    SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2011, 10 (02) : 163 - 183
  • [2] Validation of risk analysis for ship collision in narrow waters by using fuzzy Bayesian networks approach
    Aydin, Muhammet
    Akyuz, Emre
    Turan, Osman
    Arslan, Ozcan
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2021, 231
  • [3] A Bayesian belief network model of bridge deterioration
    Attoh-Okine, N. O.
    Bowers, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 159 (02) : 69 - 76
  • [4] Bayesian network model of maritime safety management
    Hanninen, Maria
    Banda, Osiris A. Valdez
    Kujala, Pentti
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (17) : 7837 - 7846
  • [5] Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model
    De Iuliis, Melissa
    Kammouh, Omar
    Cimellaro, Gian Paolo
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 208
  • [6] Analyzing and Predicting Forestry Accountancy Network Variables with Bayesian Belief Networks as Compared to Traditional Analyzing Methods
    Christoph Hartebrodt
    Reinhard Aichholz
    Marco Braasch
    Small-scale Forestry, 2011, 10 : 163 - 183
  • [7] Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model
    Kabir, Golam
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    Francisque, Alex
    Sadiq, Rehan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (01) : 220 - 234
  • [8] Consequence-based framework for buried infrastructure systems: A Bayesian belief network model
    Kabir, Golam
    Balek, Ngandu Balekelayi Celestin
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 180 : 290 - 301
  • [9] Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Kujala, Pentti
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (01) : 91 - 107
  • [10] A brief review of Bayesian belief network
    Zhang, Jinqing
    Yue, Haosong
    Wu, Xingming
    Chen, Weihai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 31ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2019), 2019, : 3910 - 3914